» Articles » PMID: 37573418

Towards Data-driven Biopsychosocial Classification of Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: a Pilot Study

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Aug 12
PMID 37573418
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The classification of non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) according to multidimensional data could guide clinical management; yet recent systematic reviews show this has not been attempted. This was a prospective cross-sectional study of participants with CLBP (n = 21) and age-, sex- and height-matched pain-free controls (n = 21). Nervous system, lumbar spinal tissue and psychosocial factors were collected. Dimensionality reduction was followed by fuzzy c-means clustering to determine sub-groups. Machine learning models (Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbour, Naïve Bayes and Random Forest) were used to determine the accuracy of classification to sub-groups. The primary analysis showed that four factors (cognitive function, depressive symptoms, general self-efficacy and anxiety symptoms) and two clusters (normal versus impaired psychosocial profiles) optimally classified participants. The error rates in classification models ranged from 4.2 to 14.2% when only CLBP patients were considered and increased to 24.2 to 37.5% when pain-free controls were added. This data-driven pilot study classified participants with CLBP into sub-groups, primarily based on psychosocial factors. This contributes to the literature as it was the first study to evaluate data-driven machine learning CLBP classification based on nervous system, lumbar spinal tissue and psychosocial factors. Future studies with larger sample sizes should validate these findings.

Citing Articles

Prevention and management of degenerative lumbar spine disorders through artificial intelligence-based decision support systems: a systematic review.

Giaccone P, DAntoni F, Russo F, Ambrosio L, Papalia G, dAngelis O BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):126.

PMID: 39915847 PMC: 11803955. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08356-x.


Evidence- and data-driven classification of low back pain via artificial intelligence: Protocol of the PREDICT-LBP study.

Belavy D, Tagliaferri S, Tegenthoff M, Enax-Krumova E, Schlaffke L, Buhring B PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0282346.

PMID: 37603539 PMC: 10441794. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282346.

References
1.
Bardin L, King P, Maher C . Diagnostic triage for low back pain: a practical approach for primary care. Med J Aust. 2017; 206(6):268-273. DOI: 10.5694/mja16.00828. View

2.
Fairbank J, Gwilym S, France J, Daffner S, Dettori J, Hermsmeyer J . The role of classification of chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(21 Suppl):S19-42. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef72c. View

3.
Tagliaferri S, Mitchell U, Saueressig T, Owen P, Miller C, Belavy D . Classification Approaches for Treating Low Back Pain Have Small Effects That Are Not Clinically Meaningful: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021; 52(2):67-84. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2022.10761. View

4.
Tagliaferri S, Ng S, Fitzgibbon B, Owen P, Miller C, Bowe S . Relative contributions of the nervous system, spinal tissue and psychosocial health to non-specific low back pain: Multivariate meta-analysis. Eur J Pain. 2021; 26(3):578-599. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1883. View

5.
Rabey M, Smith A, Kent P, Beales D, Slater H, OSullivan P . Chronic low back pain is highly individualised: patterns of classification across three unidimensional subgrouping analyses. Scand J Pain. 2019; 19(4):743-753. DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0073. View