Importance of Additional Behavioral Observation in Psychopharmacology: a Case Study on Agomelatine's Effects on Feedback Sensitivity in Probabilistic Reversal Learning in Rats

Overview

Journal Psychopharmacology (Berl)

Specialty Pharmacology

Date 2023 Aug 12

PMID 37572112

Authors

Karolina Noworyta

Agata Cieslik-Starkiewicz

Rafal Rygula

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Since the second half of the twentieth century, many important discoveries in the field of behavioral psychopharmacology have been made using operant conditioning cages. These cages provide objective data collection and have revolutionized behavioral research. Unfortunately, in the rush towards automation, many mistakes may have been made that could have been avoided by observing experimental animals. The study described in this paper is an excellent example of how important additional behavioral observation can be for interpreting instrumental data. In this study, we evaluated the effects of single injections of 3 different doses of agomelatine (5, 10, and 40 mg/kg) on feedback sensitivity in rats. To this end, we tested 40 animals in the instrumental probabilistic reversal learning task in a Latin square design. The highest applied dose of agomelatine, prima facie, reduced the sensitivity of rats to negative feedback - an effect that can be considered antidepressant. However, additional behavioral observation dramatically changed the interpretation of the results and revealed that the perceived effect of agomelatine on sensitivity to negative feedback can actually be attributed to drug-induced drowsiness.

References

Drozd R, Rychlik M, Fijalkowska A, Rygula R . Effects of cognitive judgement bias and acute antidepressant treatment on sensitivity to feedback and cognitive flexibility in the rat version of the probabilistic reversal-learning test. Behav Brain Res. 2018; 359:619-629. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.10.003. View

Haduch A, Bromek E, Rysz M, Puklo R, Papp M, Gruca P . The effects of agomelatine and imipramine on liver cytochrome P450 during chronic mild stress (CMS) in the rat. Pharmacol Rep. 2020; 72(5):1271-1287. PMC: 7550324. DOI: 10.1007/s43440-020-00151-w. View

Harmer C, Goodwin G, Cowen P . Why do antidepressants take so long to work? A cognitive neuropsychological model of antidepressant drug action. Br J Psychiatry. 2009; 195(2):102-8. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.051193. View

Harmer C, Hill S, Taylor M, Cowen P, Goodwin G . Toward a neuropsychological theory of antidepressant drug action: increase in positive emotional bias after potentiation of norepinephrine activity. Am J Psychiatry. 2003; 160(5):990-2. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.5.990. View

Lan T, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Li S, Zhu Z, Wang L . Agomelatine rescues lipopolysaccharide-induced neural injury and depression-like behaviors via suppression of the Gαi-2-PKA-ASK1 signaling pathway. J Neuroinflammation. 2022; 19(1):117. PMC: 9131561. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-022-02479-x. View

Millan M, Gobert A, Lejeune F, Dekeyne A, Newman-Tancredi A, Pasteau V . The novel melatonin agonist agomelatine (S20098) is an antagonist at 5-hydroxytryptamine2C receptors, blockade of which enhances the activity of frontocortical dopaminergic and adrenergic pathways. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003; 306(3):954-64. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.103.051797. View

Mukherjee D, Filipowicz A, Vo K, Satterthwaite T, Kable J . Reward and punishment reversal-learning in major depressive disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2020; 129(8):810-823. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000641. View

Nilsson S, Alsio J, Somerville E, Clifton P . The rat's not for turning: Dissociating the psychological components of cognitive inflexibility. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015; 56:1-14. PMC: 4726702. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.015. View

Racagni G, Riva M, Molteni R, Musazzi L, Calabrese F, Popoli M . Mode of action of agomelatine: synergy between melatonergic and 5-HT2C receptors. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2011; 12(8):574-87. DOI: 10.3109/15622975.2011.595823. View

10.

Robinson O, Cools R, Carlisi C, Sahakian B, Drevets W . Ventral striatum response during reward and punishment reversal learning in unmedicated major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2012; 169(2):152-9. PMC: 5648982. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11010137. View

11.

Roiser J, Cannon D, Gandhi S, Taylor Tavares J, Erickson K, Wood S . Hot and cold cognition in unmedicated depressed subjects with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2009; 11(2):178-89. PMC: 2670985. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00669.x. View

12.

Rygula R, Noworyta-Sokolowska K, Drozd R, Kozub A . Using rodents to model abnormal sensitivity to feedback in depression. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018; 95:336-346. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.10.008. View

13.

Slagter H, Bouwer F . Qualitative Versus Quantitative Individual Differences in Cognitive Neuroscience. J Cogn. 2021; 4(1):49. PMC: 8396117. DOI: 10.5334/joc.170. View

14.

Spasojevic J, Alloy L . Rumination as a common mechanism relating depressive risk factors to depression. Emotion. 2003; 1(1):25-37. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.1.1.25. View

15.

Vetulani J, Sulser F . Action of various antidepressant treatments reduces reactivity of noradrenergic cyclic AMP-generating system in limbic forebrain. Nature. 1975; 257(5526):495-6. DOI: 10.1038/257495a0. View