» Articles » PMID: 37571780

An Investigation of Surface EMG Shorts-Derived Training Load During Treadmill Running

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Aug 12
PMID 37571780
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was two-fold: (1) to determine the sensitivity of the sEMG shorts-derived training load (sEMG-TL) during different running speeds; and (2) to investigate the relationship between the oxygen consumption, heart rate (HR), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), accelerometry-based PlayerLoad (PL), and sEMG-TL during a running maximum oxygen uptake (V˙O) test. The study investigated ten healthy participants. On day one, participants performed a three-speed treadmill test at 8, 10, and 12 km·h for 2 min at each speed. On day two, participants performed a V˙O test. Analysis of variance found significant differences in sEMG-TL at all three speeds ( < 0.05). A significantly weak positive relationship between sEMG-TL and %V˙O ( = 0.31, < 0.05) was established, while significantly strong relationships for 8 out of 10 participants at the individual level ( = 0.72-0.97, < 0.05) were found. Meanwhile, the accelerometry PL was not significantly related to %V˙O ( > 0.05) and only demonstrated significant correlations in 3 out of 10 participants at the individual level. Therefore, the sEMG shorts-derived training load was sensitive in detecting a work rate difference of at least 2 km·h. sEMG-TL may be an acceptable metric for the measurement of internal loads and could potentially be used as a surrogate for oxygen consumption.

Citing Articles

From Tissue to System: What Constitutes an Appropriate Response to Loading?.

Gabbett T, Oetter E Sports Med. 2024; 55(1):17-35.

PMID: 39527327 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-024-02126-w.

References
1.
Guidetti L, Rivellini G, Figura F . EMG patterns during running: Intra- and inter-individual variability. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010; 6(1):37-48. DOI: 10.1016/1050-6411(95)00015-1. View

2.
Lynn S, Watkins C, Wong M, Balfany K, Feeney D . Validity and Reliability of Surface Electromyography Measurements from a Wearable Athlete Performance System. J Sports Sci Med. 2018; 17(2):205-215. PMC: 5950737. View

3.
Gabbett T . The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder?. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50(5):273-80. PMC: 4789704. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095788. View

4.
Kuiken T, Lowery M, Stoykov N . The effect of subcutaneous fat on myoelectric signal amplitude and cross-talk. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2003; 27(1):48-54. DOI: 10.3109/03093640309167976. View

5.
Finni T, Hu M, Kettunen P, Vilavuo T, Cheng S . Measurement of EMG activity with textile electrodes embedded into clothing. Physiol Meas. 2007; 28(11):1405-19. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/11/007. View