» Articles » PMID: 37571619

Hybrid Multi-Label Classification Model for Medical Applications Based on Adaptive Synthetic Data and Ensemble Learning

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Aug 12
PMID 37571619
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, both machine learning and computer vision have seen growth in the use of multi-label categorization. SMOTE is now being utilized in existing research for data balance, and SMOTE does not consider that nearby examples may be from different classes when producing synthetic samples. As a result, there can be more class overlap and more noise. To avoid this problem, this work presented an innovative technique called Adaptive Synthetic Data-Based Multi-label Classification (ASDMLC). Adaptive Synthetic (ADASYN) sampling is a sampling strategy for learning from unbalanced data sets. ADASYN weights minority class instances by learning difficulty. For hard-to-learn minority class cases, synthetic data are created. Their numerical variables are normalized with the help of the Min-Max technique to standardize the magnitude of each variable's impact on the outcomes. The values of the attribute in this work are changed to a new range, from 0 to 1, using the normalization approach. To raise the accuracy of multi-label classification, Velocity-Equalized Particle Swarm Optimization (VPSO) is utilized for feature selection. In the proposed approach, to overcome the premature convergence problem, standard PSO has been improved by equalizing the velocity with each dimension of the problem. To expose the inherent label dependencies, the multi-label classification ensemble of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN), and Clustering-Based Decision tree methods will be processed based on an averaging method. The following criteria, including precision, recall, accuracy, and error rate, are used to assess performance. The suggested model's multi-label classification accuracy is 90.88%, better than previous techniques, which is PCT, HOMER, and ML-Forest is 65.57%, 70.66%, and 82.29%, respectively.

Citing Articles

Using machine-learning models to predict extubation failure in neonates with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Tao Y, Ding X, Guo W BMC Pulm Med. 2024; 24(1):308.

PMID: 38956528 PMC: 11218173. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-024-03133-3.


Deep learning algorithm performance in contouring head and neck organs at risk: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

Liu P, Sun Y, Zhao X, Yan Y Biomed Eng Online. 2023; 22(1):104.

PMID: 37915046 PMC: 10621161. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-023-01159-y.

References
1.
Tufail A, Ma Y, Zhang Q, Khan A, Zhao L, Yang Q . 3D convolutional neural networks-based multiclass classification of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases using PET and SPECT neuroimaging modalities. Brain Inform. 2021; 8(1):23. PMC: 8560868. DOI: 10.1186/s40708-021-00144-2. View

2.
Prabha A, Yadav J, Rani A, Singh V . Design of intelligent diabetes mellitus detection system using hybrid feature selection based XGBoost classifier. Comput Biol Med. 2021; 136:104664. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104664. View

3.
Huang J, Vong C, Chen C, Zhou Y . Accurate and Efficient Large-Scale Multi-Label Learning With Reduced Feature Broad Learning System Using Label Correlation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2022; 34(12):10240-10253. DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3165299. View

4.
Joseph L, Joseph E, Prasad R . Explainable diabetes classification using hybrid Bayesian-optimized TabNet architecture. Comput Biol Med. 2022; 151(Pt A):106178. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106178. View

5.
Idarraga A, Luong G, Hsiao V, Schneider D . False Negative Rates in Benign Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis: Machine Learning for Detecting Malignancy. J Surg Res. 2021; 268:562-569. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.076. View