» Articles » PMID: 37571559

Human-Robot Interaction in Agriculture: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Aug 12
PMID 37571559
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the pursuit of optimizing the efficiency, flexibility, and adaptability of agricultural practices, human-robot interaction (HRI) has emerged in agriculture. Enabled by the ongoing advancement in information and communication technologies, this approach aspires to overcome the challenges originating from the inherent complex agricultural environments. Τhis paper systematically reviews the scholarly literature to capture the current progress and trends in this promising field as well as identify future research directions. It can be inferred that there is a growing interest in this field, which relies on combining perspectives from several disciplines to obtain a holistic understanding. The subject of the selected papers is mainly synergistic target detection, while simulation was the main methodology. Furthermore, melons, grapes, and strawberries were the crops with the highest interest for HRI applications. Finally, collaboration and cooperation were the most preferred interaction modes, with various levels of automation being examined. On all occasions, the synergy of humans and robots demonstrated the best results in terms of system performance, physical workload of workers, and time needed to execute the performed tasks. However, despite the associated progress, there is still a long way to go towards establishing viable, functional, and safe human-robot interactive systems.

Citing Articles

Digital Twins in Agriculture and Forestry: A Review.

Tagarakis A, Benos L, Kyriakarakos G, Pearson S, Sorensen C, Bochtis D Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(10).

PMID: 38793969 PMC: 11125315. DOI: 10.3390/s24103117.


OSH related risks and opportunities for industrial human-robot interaction: results from literature and practice.

Heinold E, Funk M, Niehaus S, Rosen P, Wischniewski S Front Robot AI. 2023; 10:1277360.

PMID: 37965632 PMC: 10642918. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1277360.


Sensors and Robotics for Digital Agriculture.

Tagarakis A, Bochtis D Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(16).

PMID: 37631794 PMC: 10457808. DOI: 10.3390/s23167255.

References
1.
Droukas L, Doulgeri Z, Tsakiridis N, Triantafyllou D, Kleitsiotis I, Mariolis I . A Survey of Robotic Harvesting Systems and Enabling Technologies. J Intell Robot Syst. 2023; 107(2):21. PMC: 9881528. DOI: 10.1007/s10846-022-01793-z. View

2.
Castro A, Silva F, Santos V . Trends of Human-Robot Collaboration in Industry Contexts: Handover, Learning, and Metrics. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(12). PMC: 8232712. DOI: 10.3390/s21124113. View

3.
Hoy D, Brooks P, Woolf A, Blyth F, March L, Bain C . Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012; 65(9):934-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014. View

4.
Jaramillo-Yanez A, Benalcazar M, Mena-Maldonado E . Real-Time Hand Gesture Recognition Using Surface Electromyography and Machine Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(9). PMC: 7250028. DOI: 10.3390/s20092467. View

5.
Guenat S, Purnell P, Davies Z, Nawrath M, Stringer L, Rathnaiah Babu G . Meeting sustainable development goals via robotics and autonomous systems. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):3559. PMC: 9211790. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31150-5. View