» Articles » PMID: 37569765

Asbestos and Iron

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Aug 12
PMID 37569765
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Theories of disease pathogenesis following asbestos exposure have focused on the participation of iron. After exposure, an open network of negatively charged functional groups on the fiber surface complexes host metals with a preference for iron. Competition for iron between the host and the asbestos results in a functional metal deficiency. The homeostasis of iron in the host is modified by the cell response, including increased import to correct the loss of the metal to the fiber surface. The biological effects of asbestos develop in response to and are associated with the disruption of iron homeostasis. Cell iron deficiency in the host following fiber exposure activates kinases and transcription factors, which are associated with the release of mediators coordinating both inflammatory and fibrotic responses. Relative to serpentine chrysotile, the clearance of amphiboles is incomplete, resulting in translocation to the mesothelial surface of the pleura. Since the biological effect of asbestos is dependent on retention of the fiber, the sequestration of iron by the surface, and functional iron deficiency in the cell, the greater clearance (i.e., decreased persistence) of chrysotile results in its diminished impact. An inability to clear asbestos from the lower respiratory tract initiates a host process of iron biomineralization (i.e., asbestos body formation). Host cells attempt to mobilize the metal sequestered by the fiber surface by producing superoxide at the phagosome membrane. The subsequent ferrous cation is oxidized and undergoes hydrolysis, creating poorly crystalline iron oxyhydroxide (i.e., ferrihydrite) included in the coat of the asbestos body.

Citing Articles

Bridging the gap between toxicity and carcinogenicity of mineral fibres by connecting the fibre parameters to the key characteristics of carcinogens: A comprehensive model inspiring asbestos-induced cancer prevention strategies.

Gualtieri A, Ferrari E, Rigamonti L, Ruozi B, Mirata S, Almonti V Curr Res Toxicol. 2024; 7:100202.

PMID: 39649831 PMC: 11621793. DOI: 10.1016/j.crtox.2024.100202.

References
1.
Vargas G, Cypriano J, Correa T, Leao P, Bazylinski D, Abreu F . Applications of Magnetotactic Bacteria, Magnetosomes and Magnetosome Crystals in Biotechnology and Nanotechnology: Mini-Review. Molecules. 2018; 23(10). PMC: 6222368. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102438. View

2.
Kennedy J, Tun H . The degradation of hyaluronic acid by ferrous ions. Carbohydr Res. 1972; 22(1):43-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0008-6215(00)85724-9. View

3.
Bernstein D, Chevalier J, Smith P . Comparison of Calidria chrysotile asbestos to pure tremolite: final results of the inhalation biopersistence and histopathology examination following short-term exposure. Inhal Toxicol. 2005; 17(9):427-49. DOI: 10.1080/08958370591002012. View

4.
Nagai H, Okazaki Y, Chew S, Misawa N, Yasui H, Toyokuni S . Deferasirox induces mesenchymal-epithelial transition in crocidolite-induced mesothelial carcinogenesis in rats. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2013; 6(11):1222-30. DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0244. View

5.
Gualtieri A, Lusvardi G, Zoboli A, Di Giuseppe D, Gualtieri M . Biodurability and release of metals during the dissolution of chrysotile, crocidolite and fibrous erionite. Environ Res. 2019; 171:550-557. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.011. View