» Articles » PMID: 37564948

Single-port Multiport Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: Initial Experiences by Case-matched Analysis of Short-term Outcomes

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Aug 11
PMID 37564948
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The da Vinci single-port (SP) system has been used in various surgical fields, including colorectal surgery. However, limited experience has been reported on its safety and feasibility. This study aims to evaluate the short-term outcomes of SP robotic surgery for the treatment of rectal cancer compared with multiport (MP) robotic surgery.

Methods: Rectal cancer patients who underwent curative resection in 2020 were reviewed. A total of 43 patients underwent robotic total mesorectal excision (TME), of which 26 (13 in each group, SP MP) were included in the case-matched cohort for analysis. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes and pathological results were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: Median tumor height was similar between the 2 groups (SP MP: 5.9 cm [range, 2.2-9.6 cm] 6.7 cm [range, 3.4-10.0 cm], P = 0.578). Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was equally performed (38.5%). The median estimated blood loss was less (20.0 mL [range, 5.0-20.0 mL] 30.0 mL [range, 20.0-30.0 mL], P = 0.020) and the median hospital stay was shorter (7 days [range, 6-8 days] 8 days [range, 7-9 days], P = 0.055) in the SP group. Postoperative complications did not differ (SP MP: 7.7% 23.1%, P = 0.587). One patient in the SP group and 3 in the MP group experienced anastomotic leakage.

Conclusion: SP robotic TME showed perioperative outcomes similar to MP robotic TME. The SP robotic system can be considered a surgical option for the treatment of rectal cancer. Further prospective randomized trials with larger cohorts are required.

Citing Articles

Da Vinci single-port robotic system current application and future perspective in general surgery: A scoping review.

Celotto F, Ramacciotti N, Mangano A, Danieli G, Pinto F, Lopez P Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(9):4814-4830.

PMID: 39110221 PMC: 11362253. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11126-w.


Single-incision Laparoscopic Colonic Surgery: A Systemic Review, Meta-analysis, and Future Prospect.

Suzuki Y, Tei M, Wakasugi M, Ohtsuka M, Hagihara K, Ikenaga M J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024; 8(2):48-60.

PMID: 38689785 PMC: 11056536. DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2023-078.

References
1.
Ryu H, Kim J . Current status and role of robotic approach in patients with low-lying rectal cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022; 103(1):1-11. PMC: 9300439. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2022.103.1.1. View

2.
Lujan J, Soriano M, Abrisqueta J, Perez D, Parrilla P . Single-port Colectomy VS Multi-port Laparoscopic Colectomy. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of More Than 2800 Procedures. Cir Esp. 2015; 93(5):307-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2014.11.009. View

3.
Jung K, Yun S, Cho Y, Kim H, Lee W, Chun H . Single incision and reduced port laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: initial experience in 96 cases. ANZ J Surg. 2014; 86(5):403-7. DOI: 10.1111/ans.12775. View

4.
Park H, Lee J, Lee H, Lee K, Song S, Toesca A . Development of Robotic Mastectomy Using a Single-Port Surgical Robot System. J Breast Cancer. 2020; 23(1):107-112. PMC: 7043949. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2020.23.e3. View

5.
Bae S, Jegon W, Baek S . Single plus one-port robotic surgery using the da Vinci Single-Site Platform versus conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022; 17(1):179-187. PMC: 8886472. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.112678. View