» Articles » PMID: 37564237

A Study of Focal and Segmental Glomerulosclerosis According to the Columbia Classification and Its Correlation with the Clinical Outcome

Overview
Specialty Pathology
Date 2023 Aug 11
PMID 37564237
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a leading cause of nephrotic syndrome in both adults and children. The "Columbia classification of FSGS" includes five variants; not otherwise specified (NOS), tip, perihilar, cellular, and collapsing variants that may have different prognostic and therapeutic implications.  This is a retrospective study and was carried out in the Department of Histopathology, Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad. Of a total of 11,691 kidney biopsies over a 7-year period, from 2006 to 2012, 824 cases were diagnosed as FSGS, of which 610 cases in which detailed clinical findings were available were included in this study. FSGS was then categorized according to the Columbia classification.  FSGS, NOS was the predominant histomorphological variant. Serum creatinine was significantly high in the collapsing variant, followed by NOS. Follow-up data was available for 103 cases,72.8% had complete remission, 10.6% had partial remission, and in 16.5 % there was no remission. Relapses were observed in 6.7% cases, two patients (1.9%) succumbed, and 4.8% cases progressed to chronic kidney disease.  This study showed that perihilar variant was less prevalent, with tip and cellular variants being more prevalent in Indian subcontinent compared to Western literature. Collapsing variant was also less common.

Citing Articles

Clinicopathological features and medium-term outcomes of histologic variants of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in adults: A retrospective study.

Jafry N, Manan S, Rashid R, Mubarak M World J Nephrol. 2024; 13(1):88028.

PMID: 38596270 PMC: 11000038. DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v13.i1.88028.

References
1.
Trivedi M, Pasari A, Chowdhury A, Abraham-Kurien A, Pandey R . The Spectrum of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis from Eastern India: Is It Different?. Indian J Nephrol. 2018; 28(3):215-219. PMC: 5998723. DOI: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_115_17. View

2.
Chun M, Korbet S, Schwartz M, Lewis E . Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in nephrotic adults: presentation, prognosis, and response to therapy of the histologic variants. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004; 15(8):2169-77. DOI: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000135051.62500.97. View

3.
Shi S, Wang S, Zhang Y, Zhao M, Zou W . [Clinicopathologic study of different variants of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis]. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2007; 36(1):11-4. View

4.
Nada R, Kharbanda J, Bhatti A, Minz R, Sakhuja V, Joshi K . Primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in adults: is the Indian cohort different?. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009; 24(12):3701-7. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp328. View

5.
Deegens J, Steenbergen E, Borm G, Wetzels J . Pathological variants of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in an adult Dutch population--epidemiology and outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007; 23(1):186-92. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfm523. View