» Articles » PMID: 37563636

Single Institution Retrospective Study Evaluating the Frequency of Implant Removal and Associated Risk Factors Following Open Fracture Fixation in 80 Cases (2010-2020)

Overview
Journal BMC Vet Res
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Aug 10
PMID 37563636
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Open fractures occur commonly in small animals and are characterised by contamination of the fracture site. While never quantified, it is believed that open fractures stabilised with internal implants are at a higher risk for requiring explantation. This retrospective study determines the frequency and risk factors for explantation following use of internal fixation. Medical records of client-owned dogs and cats with an open fracture, between 2010 and 2020 stabilised using internal implants, were included. Data retrieved included signalment, cause and characterisation of the fracture, comorbidities, preexisting infections, and all details related to anesthesia and surgery. Pre-, Peri- and post-operative antibiotic use were detailed. All cases were followed to clinical union. Postoperative complications, including requirement for implant removal were recorded and classified as major or minor. Associations between potential risk factors and need for explantation were assessed.

Results: Of 80 cases, 72 (90%) were dogs and eight (10%) cats. Major complications were encountered in 23 (28.75%) cases and minor complications in 16 (20%) cases. Explantation was performed in 17 cases (21.25%). Out of 72 dogs, 13 required explantation (18%) whereas four of the eight cats needed implants removed (50%). Only diagnosis of postoperative infection was associated with an increased risk of explantation (RR 2.77; 95% CI 1.25; 6.15; p = 0.045).

Conclusion: Approximately 1 in 5 open fractures stabilised using internal fixation can be anticipated to require explantation, with cats potentially being at a higher risk than dogs. Cases diagnosed with postoperative infection are at a higher risk for requiring implant removal.

References
1.
Lack W, Karunakar M, Angerame M, Seymour R, Sims S, Kellam J . Type III open tibia fractures: immediate antibiotic prophylaxis minimizes infection. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 29(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000262. View

2.
Schmidmaier G, Lucke M, Wildemann B, Haas N, Raschke M . Prophylaxis and treatment of implant-related infections by antibiotic-coated implants: a review. Injury. 2006; 37 Suppl 2:S105-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.016. View

3.
Lenarz C, Watson J, Moed B, Israel H, Mullen J, Macdonald J . Timing of wound closure in open fractures based on cultures obtained after debridement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(10):1921-6. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00547. View

4.
Horn B, Rettig M . Interobserver reliability in the Gustilo and Anderson classification of open fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1993; 7(4):357-60. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199308000-00012. View

5.
Patzakis M, Wilkins J, Moore T . Considerations in reducing the infection rate in open tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; (178):36-41. View