Courtship Suppression in Drosophila Melanogaster: The Role of Mating Failure

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2023 Aug 10

PMID 37561803

Authors

Anna A Goncharova

Natalia G Besedina

Julia V Bragina

Larisa V Danilenkova

Elena A Kamysheva

Sergei A Fedotov

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster is a popular model organism in the study of memory due to a wide arsenal of methods used to analyze neuronal activity. The most commonly used tests in research of behavioral plasticity are shock avoidance associated with chemosensory cues and courtship suppression after mating failure. Many authors emphasize the value of courtship suppression as a model of behavior most appropriate to natural conditions. However, researchers often investigate courtship suppression using immobilized and decapitated females as targets of courtship by males, which makes the data obtained from such flies less valuable. In our study, we evaluate courtship suppression towards immature mobile non-receptive females after training with mated or immature females combined with an aversive stimulus (quinine). We have shown that the previously described mechanisms of courtship suppression, as a result of the association of the courtship object with the repellent, as well as due to increased sensitivity to the anti-aphrodisiac cVA after mating failure, are not confirmed when immature mobile females are used. We discuss the reasons for the discrepancies between our results and literature data, define the conditions to be met in the courtship suppression test if the aim is to analyze the natural forms of behavioral plasticity, and present data on the test modifications to approximate conditions to natural ones.

References

Montague S, Baker B . Memory Elicited by Courtship Conditioning Requires Mushroom Body Neuronal Subsets Similar to Those Utilized in Appetitive Memory. PLoS One. 2016; 11(10):e0164516. PMC: 5072562. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164516. View

Wang L, Han X, Mehren J, Hiroi M, Billeter J, Miyamoto T . Hierarchical chemosensory regulation of male-male social interactions in Drosophila. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14(6):757-62. PMC: 3102769. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2800. View

Clemens J, Coen P, Roemschied F, Pereira T, Mazumder D, Aldarondo D . Discovery of a New Song Mode in Drosophila Reveals Hidden Structure in the Sensory and Neural Drivers of Behavior. Curr Biol. 2018; 28(15):2400-2412.e6. PMC: 6830513. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.011. View

Ventura A, Inamdar L, Mennella J . Consistency in infants' behavioural signalling of satiation during bottle-feeding. Pediatr Obes. 2014; 10(3):180-7. PMC: 4282834. DOI: 10.1111/ijpo.250. View

Ishimoto H, Sakai T, Kitamoto T . Ecdysone signaling regulates the formation of long-term courtship memory in adult Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(15):6381-6. PMC: 2669368. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810213106. View

SPIETH H . Courtship behavior in Drosophila. Annu Rev Entomol. 1974; 19:385-405. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.en.19.010174.002125. View

Nuzzo R . Randomization Test: An Alternative Analysis for the Difference of Two Means. PM R. 2017; 9(3):306-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.02.001. View

Ejima A, Smith B, Lucas C, van der Goes van Naters W, Miller C, Carlson J . Generalization of courtship learning in Drosophila is mediated by cis-vaccenyl acetate. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(7):599-605. PMC: 1913718. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.053. View

Tompkins L, Siegel R, Gailey D, Hall J . Conditioned courtship in Drosophila and its mediation by association of chemical cues. Behav Genet. 1983; 13(6):565-78. DOI: 10.1007/BF01076402. View

10.

Wijesekera T, Saurabh S, Dauwalder B . Juvenile Hormone Is Required in Adult Males for Drosophila Courtship. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0151912. PMC: 4803231. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151912. View

11.

Zhuravlev A, Ivanova P, Makaveeva K, Zakharov G, Nikitina E, Savvateeva-Popova E . Mutation in Affects Phenoxazinone Synthase Catalytic Site and Impairs Long-Term Memory. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(20). PMC: 9604555. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012356. View

12.

Tompkins L, Gross A, Hall J, Gailey D, Siegel R . The role of female movement in the sexual behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet. 1982; 12(3):295-307. DOI: 10.1007/BF01067849. View

13.

Ambrogi Lorenzini C, Bucherelli C, Giachetti A . Passive and active avoidance behavior in the light-dark box test. Physiol Behav. 1984; 32(4):687-9. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90327-5. View

14.

Raun N, Jones S, Kramer J . Conditioned courtship suppression in . J Neurogenet. 2021; 35(3):154-167. DOI: 10.1080/01677063.2021.1873323. View

15.

Verzijden M, Abbott J, von Philipsborn A, Loeschcke V . Male learn to prefer an arbitrary trait associated with female mating status. Curr Zool. 2020; 61(6):1036-1042. PMC: 7098673. DOI: 10.1093/czoolo/61.6.1036. View

16.

Ejima A, Smith B, Lucas C, Levine J, Griffith L . Sequential learning of pheromonal cues modulates memory consolidation in trainer-specific associative courtship conditioning. Curr Biol. 2005; 15(3):194-206. PMC: 2805828. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.035. View

17.

Gailey D, Jackson F, Siegel R . Conditioning Mutations in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER Affect an Experience-Dependent Behavioral Modification in Courting Males. Genetics. 1984; 106(4):613-23. PMC: 1202293. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/106.4.613. View

18.

Meiselman M, Ganguly A, Dahanukar A, Adams M . Endocrine modulation of primary chemosensory neurons regulates Drosophila courtship behavior. PLoS Genet. 2022; 18(8):e1010357. PMC: 9439213. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010357. View

19.

von Philipsborn A . Neuroscience: The Female Art of Saying No. Curr Biol. 2020; 30(19):R1080-R1083. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.023. View

20.

Keleman K, Kruttner S, Alenius M, Dickson B . Function of the Drosophila CPEB protein Orb2 in long-term courtship memory. Nat Neurosci. 2007; 10(12):1587-93. DOI: 10.1038/nn1996. View