» Articles » PMID: 37561363

Liquid Biopsy in Ovarian Cancer: Advantages and Limitations for Prognosis and Diagnosis

Overview
Journal Med Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Aug 10
PMID 37561363
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a highly fatal gynecologic malignancy, often diagnosed at an advanced stage which presents significant challenges for disease management. The clinical application of conventional tissue biopsy methods and serological biomarkers has limitations for the diagnosis and prognosis of OC patients. Liquid biopsy is a novel sampling method that involves analyzing distinctive tumor elements secreted into the peripheral blood. Growing evidence suggests that liquid biopsy methods such as circulating tumor cells, cell-free RNA, circulating tumor DNA, exosomes, and tumor-educated platelets may improve early prognosis and diagnosis of OC, leading to enhanced therapeutic management of the disease. This study reviewed the evidence demonstrating the utility of liquid biopsy components in OC prognosis and diagnosis, and evaluated the current advantages and limitations of these methods. Additionally, the existing obstacles and crucial topics for future studies utilizing liquid biopsy in OC patients were discussed.

Citing Articles

Gynecologic Cancer Screening and Prevention: State of the Science and Practice.

Tran C, Diaz-Ayllon H, Abulez D, Chinta S, Williams-Brown M, Desravines N Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2025; .

PMID: 40014217 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-025-01301-z.


Liquid biopsy in cancer current: status, challenges and future prospects.

Ma L, Guo H, Zhao Y, Liu Z, Wang C, Bu J Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024; 9(1):336.

PMID: 39617822 PMC: 11609310. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-02021-w.


The human volatilome meets cancer diagnostics: past, present, and future of noninvasive applications.

Barbosa J, Antoniosi Filho N Metabolomics. 2024; 20(5):113.

PMID: 39375265 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-024-02180-5.


USP33 facilitates the ovarian cancer progression via deubiquitinating and stabilizing CBX2.

Chen J, Shan W, Jia Q, Chen Y, Jiang W, Tian Y Oncogene. 2024; 43(43):3170-3183.

PMID: 39256572 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-024-03151-9.


Revisiting the standards of cancer detection and therapy alongside their comparison to modern methods.

Gromek P, Senkowska Z, Pluciennik E, Pasieka Z, Zhao L, Gielecinska A World J Methodol. 2024; 14(2):92982.

PMID: 38983668 PMC: 11229876. DOI: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i2.92982.


References
1.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

2.
Brown Y, Hua S, Tanwar P . Extracellular matrix in high-grade serous ovarian cancer: Advances in understanding of carcinogenesis and cancer biology. Matrix Biol. 2023; 118:16-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2023.02.004. View

3.
Torre L, Trabert B, DeSantis C, Miller K, Samimi G, Runowicz C . Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(4):284-296. PMC: 6621554. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21456. View

4.
Kobel M, Luo L, Grevers X, Lee S, Brooks-Wilson A, Gilks C . Ovarian Carcinoma Histotype: Strengths and Limitations of Integrating Morphology With Immunohistochemical Predictions. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2018; 38(4):353-362. PMC: 6291360. DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000530. View

5.
Sun Y, Xu J, Jia X . The Diagnosis, Treatment, Prognosis and Molecular Pathology of Borderline Ovarian Tumors: Current Status and Perspectives. Cancer Manag Res. 2020; 12:3651-3659. PMC: 7246309. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S250394. View