» Articles » PMID: 37560522

Identification of Host Receptors for Viral Entry and Beyond: a Perspective from the Spike of SARS-CoV-2

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2023 Aug 10
PMID 37560522
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Identification of the interaction between the host membrane receptor and viral receptor-binding domain (RBD) represents a crucial step for understanding viral pathophysiology and for developing drugs against pathogenic viruses. While all membrane receptors and carbohydrate chains could potentially be used as receptors for viruses, prioritized searches focus typically on membrane receptors that are known to have been used by the relatives of the pathogenic virus, e.g., ACE2 used as a receptor for SARS-CoV is a prioritized candidate receptor for SARS-CoV-2. An ideal receptor protein from a viral perspective is one that is highly expressed in epithelial cell surface of mammalian respiratory or digestive tracts, strongly conserved in evolution so many mammalian species can serve as potential hosts, and functionally important so that its expression cannot be readily downregulated by the host in response to the infection. Experimental confirmation of host receptors includes (1) infection studies with cell cultures/tissues/organs with or without candidate receptor expression, (2) experimental determination of protein structure of the complex between the putative viral RDB and the candidate host receptor, and (3) experiments with mutant candidate receptor or homologues of the candidate receptor in other species. Successful identification of the host receptor opens the door for mechanism-based development of candidate drugs and vaccines and facilitates the inference of what other animal species are vulnerable to the viral pathogen. I illustrate these approaches with research on identification of the receptor and co-factors for SARS-CoV-2.

Citing Articles

Structural proteins of human coronaviruses: what makes them different?.

Minigulov N, Boranbayev K, Bekbossynova A, Gadilgereyeva B, Filchakova O Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024; 14:1458383.

PMID: 39711780 PMC: 11659265. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1458383.


Potential Alternative Receptors for SARS-CoV-2-Induced Kidney Damage: TLR-4, KIM-1/TIM-1, and CD147.

Habeichi N, Amin G, Lakkis B, Kataya R, Mericskay M, Booz G Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2024; 29(1):8.

PMID: 38287815 PMC: 10924798. DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2901008.

References
1.
Adams L, Dinnon 3rd K, Hou Y, Sheahan T, Heise M, Baric R . Critical ACE2 Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 and Group 2B Coronavirus Infection and Replication. mBio. 2021; 12(2). PMC: 8092278. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.03149-20. View

2.
Naqvi S, Godfrey A, Hughes J, Goodheart M, Mitchell R, Page D . Conservation, acquisition, and functional impact of sex-biased gene expression in mammals. Science. 2019; 365(6450). PMC: 6896219. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw7317. View

3.
Hamming I, Timens W, Bulthuis M, Lely A, Navis G, van Goor H . Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J Pathol. 2004; 203(2):631-7. PMC: 7167720. DOI: 10.1002/path.1570. View

4.
Guindon S, Gascuel O . A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003; 52(5):696-704. DOI: 10.1080/10635150390235520. View

5.
Matsuyama S, Ujike M, Morikawa S, Tashiro M, Taguchi F . Protease-mediated enhancement of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(35):12543-7. PMC: 1194915. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0503203102. View