» Articles » PMID: 37560353

Evaluative Altmetrics: is There Evidence for Its Application to Research Evaluation?

Overview
Date 2023 Aug 10
PMID 37560353
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Altmetrics have been demonstrated as a promising tool for analyzing scientific communication on social media. Nevertheless, its application for research evaluation remains underdeveloped, despite the advancement of research in the study of diverse scientific interactions.

Methods: This paper develops a method for applying altmetrics in the evaluation of researchers, focusing on a case study of the Environment/Ecology ESI field publications by researchers at the University of Granada. We considered Twitter as a mirror of social attention, news outlets as media, and Wikipedia as educational, exploring mentions from these three sources and the associated actors in their respective media, contextualizing them using various metrics.

Results: Our analysis evaluated different dimensions such as the type of audience, local attention, engagement generated around the mention, and the profile of the actor. Our methodology effectively provided dashboards that gave a comprehensive view of the different instances of social attention at the author level.

Discussion: The use of altmetrics for research evaluation presents significant potential, as shown by our case study. While this is a novel method, our results suggest that altmetrics could provide valuable insights into the social attention that researchers garner. This can be an important tool for research evaluation, expanding our understanding beyond traditional metrics.

Citing Articles

Elucidating the pathogenesis behind arteriovenous malformations of the central nervous system: a bibliometric analysis.

Astudillo Potes M, Bauman M, Shoushtari A, Winter B, Singh R, Rahmani R Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):133.

PMID: 38556597 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02367-3.

References
1.
Mittermeier J, Correia R, Grenyer R, Toivonen T, Roll U . Using Wikipedia to measure public interest in biodiversity and conservation. Conserv Biol. 2021; 35(2):412-423. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13702. View

2.
Diaz-Faes A, Bowman T, Costas R . Towards a second generation of 'social media metrics': Characterizing Twitter communities of attention around science. PLoS One. 2019; 14(5):e0216408. PMC: 6530891. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216408. View

3.
Zahedi Z, Costas R . General discussion of data quality challenges in social media metrics: Extensive comparison of four major altmetric data aggregators. PLoS One. 2018; 13(5):e0197326. PMC: 5957428. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197326. View

4.
Arroyo-Machado W, Torres-Salinas D, Herrera-Viedma E, Romero-Frias E . Science through Wikipedia: A novel representation of open knowledge through co-citation networks. PLoS One. 2020; 15(2):e0228713. PMC: 7010282. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228713. View

5.
Seibold S, Rammer W, Hothorn T, Seidl R, Ulyshen M, Lorz J . The contribution of insects to global forest deadwood decomposition. Nature. 2021; 597(7874):77-81. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03740-8. View