» Articles » PMID: 37558822

Measure Quantity of Mitochondrial DNA in Aged Bones or Calculate It from Nuclear DNA Quantitative PCR Results?

Overview
Journal Int J Legal Med
Specialty Forensic Sciences
Date 2023 Aug 9
PMID 37558822
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is of great value in forensics to procure information about a person when a next of kin, personal belongings, or other sources of nuclear DNA (nDNA) are unavailable, or nDNA is lacking in quality and quantity. The quality and reliability of the results depend greatly on ensuring optimal conditions for the given method, for instance, the optimal input of the copy number (CN) in next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods. The unavailability of commercial quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods to determine mtDNA CN creates the necessity to rely on recommendations to infer mtDNA CN from nDNA yield. Because nDNA yield varies between individuals, tissues, parts of the same tissue, and because mtDNA CN varies between tissues, such assumptions must be examined for a specific context, rather than be generalized. This study compares mtDNA CN calculated from nDNA yield and qPCR measured mtDNA CN. Seventy-five femurs from the Second World War victims were used as samples; they were cut below the greater trochanter, surface contaminants were removed by mechanical and chemical cleaning, samples were fully demineralized, and DNA was isolated. PowerQuant® Kit (Promega) was used to analyze DNA yield. An in-house method was used to determine mtDNA CN. Comparison of mtDNA CN from nDNA derived calculations and measured mtDNA CN highlighted vast differences. The results emphasize the need to perform qPCR to assess mtDNA CN before NGS analyses of aged bones' mitogenomes rather than estimating mtDNA CN from nDNA yield to ensure the quality and reliability of the results of NGS analysis.

Citing Articles

Enhancement of the Precision ID Mitochondrial DNA Whole Genome System for Challenging Unidentified Human Remains.

Canale L, Date-Chong M, Wallin J, Sheehan S, Battaglia J, Halsing M Genes (Basel). 2025; 16(2).

PMID: 40004450 PMC: 11855493. DOI: 10.3390/genes16020119.


Testing the informativeness of Y-STR and mitochondrial DNA control region markers in an attempt to predict ancestry of World War II victims from Slovenian mass grave.

Obal M, Zupanc T, Zupanic Pajnic I Int J Legal Med. 2024; 139(2):483-493.

PMID: 39547996 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-024-03368-z.

References
1.
Allen M, Engstrom A, Meyers S, Handt O, SALDEEN T, Von Haeseler A . Mitochondrial DNA sequencing of shed hairs and saliva on robbery caps: sensitivity and matching probabilities. J Forensic Sci. 1998; 43(3):453-64. View

2.
Divne A, Nilsson M, Calloway C, Reynolds R, Erlich H, Allen M . Forensic casework analysis using the HVI/HVII mtDNA linear array assay. J Forensic Sci. 2005; 50(3):548-54. View

3.
Dudas E, Susa E, Pamjav H, Szabolcsi Z . Identification of World War II bone remains found in Ukraine using classical anthropological and mitochondrial DNA results. Int J Legal Med. 2019; 134(2):487-489. PMC: 7044253. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-019-02026-z. View

4.
Marshall C, Taylor R, Sturk-Andreaggi K, Barritt-Ross S, Berg G, McMahon T . Mitochondrial DNA haplogrouping to assist with the identification of unknown service members from the World War II Battle of Tarawa. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020; 47:102291. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102291. View

5.
Giles R, Blanc H, Cann H, Wallace D . Maternal inheritance of human mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980; 77(11):6715-9. PMC: 350359. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6715. View