» Articles » PMID: 37554920

Difference in Presentation, Outcomes, and Hospital Epidemiologic Trend of COVID-19 Among First, Second, and Third Waves: a Review of Hospital Records and Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Methods: The authors reviewed the hospital records between April 2020 and September 2021 and followed up on the patients for post-COVID complications.

Findings: Older adult patients were predominantly affected during the third wave, and middle-aged patients were predominantly affected during the first and second waves. Men were predominantly admitted, considering the three waves, although more women were admitted in the second wave. Cough was more common in the second and third waves than in the first wave 522 (59.7%). Respiratory distress was the most common in the third wave, 251(67.1%), and least common in the first wave, 403 (46.1%). Anosmia was more common in the third wave 116 (31.2%). In the third wave, patients presenting in a critical state 23 (6.2%) and with severe disease 152 (40.8%) were more common. The hospital admission median (IQR) was longer in the first wave, 12 (8-20), than in other waves. More patients were admitted in the first wave (52%) than in the other waves, and patients received more oxygen in the third wave (75%) than in the other waves. Death occurred more commonly in the first wave (51%) than in the other waves. The positivity rate was higher in the third wave (22.8%) than in the other waves. In the third wave, the positivity rate was higher in women (24.3%) than in men. Post-COVID cough increased in the second wave, and fatigue was higher in the third wave than in the other waves. Tiredness and memory loss were greater during the second wave than in other waves.

Conclusion: The authors found differences in the presentation, outcomes, and hospital epidemiologic trend of COVID-19 among the three waves.

Citing Articles

Seven Epidemic Waves of COVID-19 in a Hospital in Madrid: Analysis of Severity and Associated Factors.

San Martin-Lopez J, Mesa N, Bernal-Bello D, Morales-Ortega A, Rivilla M, Guerrero M Viruses. 2023; 15(9).

PMID: 37766248 PMC: 10538062. DOI: 10.3390/v15091839.

References
1.
De La Cruz-Hernandez S, Alvarez-Contreras A . Omicron Variant in Mexico: the Fourth COVID-19 Wave. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022; :1-2. PMC: 9314319. DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2022.160. View

2.
Devnath P, Hossain M, Emran T, Mitra S . Massive third wave of COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh: a co-epidemic of dengue might worsen the situation. Future Virol. 2022; . PMC: 8906578. DOI: 10.2217/fvl-2021-0182. View

3.
Schurz H, Salie M, Tromp G, Hoal E, Kinnear C, Moller M . The X chromosome and sex-specific effects in infectious disease susceptibility. Hum Genomics. 2019; 13(1):2. PMC: 6325731. DOI: 10.1186/s40246-018-0185-z. View

4.
Bari R, Sultana F . Second Wave of COVID-19 in Bangladesh: An Integrated and Coordinated Set of Actions Is Crucial to Tackle Current Upsurge of Cases and Deaths. Front Public Health. 2021; 9:699918. PMC: 8437241. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.699918. View

5.
Iftimie S, Lopez-Azcona A, Vallverdu I, Hernandez-Flix S, de Febrer G, Parra S . First and second waves of coronavirus disease-19: A comparative study in hospitalized patients in Reus, Spain. PLoS One. 2021; 16(3):e0248029. PMC: 8011765. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248029. View