Improved Diagnosis Through Diastolic Hyperemia-Free Ratio (DFR) over Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in Intermediate Coronary Lesions

Objectives: To compare the fractional flow reserve (FFR) and diastolic hyperemia-free ratio (DFR) measurements in a population with intermediate coronary artery stenosis and improve the diagnosis.

Background: Visual assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity, particularly in intermediate lesions, is prone to errors in decision-making. FFR provides a reliable assessment of functional severity in these cases but requires hyperemia induction by adenosine, which has side effects and increased cost. DFR is a novel hyperemia-independent index, which could be used as an alternative to adenosine-based hyperemia induction.

Methods And Results: Between September 2019 to March 2020, 25 patients with 38 intermediate coronary stenotic lesions were included in the study. All patients underwent assessment of whole cycle Pd/Pa (ratio of distal coronary pressure to proximal aortic pressure), DFR and FFR. Mean whole cycle Pd/Pa, DFR and FFR were 0.93±0.06, 0.88±0.09, and 0.85±0.08, respectively. A significant positive correlation between DFR and FFR [r = 0.74; p<0.001] was observed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.90. DFR-only strategy with a treatment cut-off of ≤0.89 showed a diagnostic agreement with the FFR-only strategy in 74% of lesions, with a sensitivity of 54%, specificity of 82%, a positive predictive value of 60%, and a negative predictive value of 79%.

Conclusions: Real-time DFR measurements show a clinically reliable correlation with FFR. Hence, using DFR is likely to avoid adenosine administration as well as reduce the cost and procedural time. Further studies with a larger sample size would be ideal to evaluate specific cut-off values and endpoints.

References

Ligthart J, Masdjedi K, Witberg K, Mastik F, van Zandvoort L, Lemmert M . Validation of Resting Diastolic Pressure Ratio Calculated by a Novel Algorithm and Its Correlation With Distal Coronary Artery Pressure to Aortic Pressure, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio, and Fractional Flow Reserve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11(12):e006911. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006911. View

Jeremias A, Maehara A, Genereux P, Asrress K, Berry C, De Bruyne B . Multicenter core laboratory comparison of the instantaneous wave-free ratio and resting Pd/Pa with fractional flow reserve: the RESOLVE study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 63(13):1253-1261. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.060. View

Petraco R, Park J, Sen S, Nijjer S, Malik I, Echavarria-Pinto M . Hybrid iFR-FFR decision-making strategy: implications for enhancing universal adoption of physiology-guided coronary revascularisation. EuroIntervention. 2012; 8(10):1157-65. DOI: 10.4244/EIJV8I10A179. View

Petraco R, Escaned J, Sen S, Nijjer S, Asrress K, Echavarria-Pinto M . Classification performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve in a clinical population of intermediate coronary stenoses: results of the ADVISE registry. EuroIntervention. 2012; 9(1):91-101. DOI: 10.4244/EIJV9I1A14. View

Mamas M, Horner S, Welch E, Ashworth A, Millington S, Fraser D . Resting Pd/Pa measured with intracoronary pressure wire strongly predicts fractional flow reserve. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010; 22(6):260-5. View

Pisters R, Ilhan M, Veenstra L, Gho B, Stein M, Hoorntje J . Instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve in clinical practice. Neth Heart J. 2018; 26(7-8):385-392. PMC: 6046658. DOI: 10.1007/s12471-018-1125-1. View

Ludman P, Stephens N, Harcombe A, Lowe M, Shapiro L, Schofield P . Radial versus femoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography in stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 79(9):1239-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00089-1. View

Park J, Petraco R, Nam C, Doh J, Davies J, Escaned J . Clinical validation of the resting pressure parameters in the assessment of functionally significant coronary stenosis; results of an independent, blinded comparison with fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168(4):4070-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.030. View

Escaned J, Echavarria-Pinto M, Garcia-Garcia H, van de Hoef T, de Vries T, Kaul P . Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio to Assess Coronary Stenosis Relevance: Results of ADVISE II International, Multicenter Study (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation II). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8(6):824-833. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.029. View

10.

Gruntzig A, SENNING A, SIEGENTHALER W . Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1979; 301(2):61-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197907123010201. View

11.

Jolly S, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta S . Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2008; 157(1):132-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.023. View

12.

Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, Erriquez A, Penzo C, Tumscitz C, Scoccia A . Comparison of quantitative flow ratio, Pd/Pa and diastolic hyperemia-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve in non-culprit lesion of patients with non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 98(6):1057-1065. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29380. View

13.

Crystal G, Klein L . Fractional flow reserve: physiological basis, advantages and limitations, and potential gender differences. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2014; 11(3):209-19. PMC: 4558352. DOI: 10.2174/1573403x10666141020113318. View

14.

Tonino P, De Bruyne B, Pijls N, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van t Veer M . Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(3):213-24. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611. View

15.

Sen S, Escaned J, Malik I, Mikhail G, Foale R, Mila R . Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 59(15):1392-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.003. View

16.

Gotberg M, Christiansen E, Gudmundsdottir I, Sandhall L, Danielewicz M, Jakobsen L . Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(19):1813-1823. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616540. View

17.

De Bruyne B, Pijls N, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino P, Piroth Z . Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(11):991-1001. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. View

18.

Johnson N, Li W, Chen X, Hennigan B, Watkins S, Berry C . Diastolic pressure ratio: new approach and validation vs. the instantaneous wave-free ratio. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40(31):2585-2594. PMC: 6692701. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz230. View

19.

White C, Wright C, Doty D, Hiratza L, Eastham C, Harrison D . Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?. N Engl J Med. 1984; 310(13):819-24. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198403293101304. View

20.

Sallam M, Al-Hadi H, Rathinasekar S, Chandy S . Comparative study of the radial and femoral artery approaches for diagnostic coronary angiography. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2011; 9(3):272-8. PMC: 3074808. View