» Articles » PMID: 37554332

Identification of Prior Dengue-naïve Dengvaxia Recipients with an Increased Risk for Symptomatic Dengue During Fever Surveillance in the Philippines

Overview
Journal Front Immunol
Date 2023 Aug 9
PMID 37554332
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Dengue virus (DENV) is the leading cause of mosquito-borne viral diseases in humans. Dengvaxia, the first licensed dengue vaccine, is recommended for DENV-seropositive individuals aged 9-45 years. In the Philippines, Dengvaxia was administered to more than 830,000 children without prior serological testing in 2016-2017. Subsequently, it was revealed that DENV-seronegative children who received Dengvaxia developed severe disease following breakthrough DENV infection. As a result, thousands of children participating in the mass vaccination campaign were at higher risk of severe dengue disease. It is vital that an assay that identifies baseline DENV-naïve Dengvaxia recipients be developed and validated. This would permit more frequent and extensive assessments and timely treatment of breakthrough DENV infections.

Methods: We evaluated the performance of a candidate assay, the DENV1-4 nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), developed by the University of Hawaii (UH), using well-documented serum/plasma samples including those >20 years post-DENV infection, and tested samples from 199 study participants including 100 Dengvaxia recipients from the fever surveillance programs in the Philippines.

Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the assay were 96.6% and 99.4%, respectively, which are higher than those reported for pre-vaccination screening. A significantly higher rate of symptomatic breakthrough DENV infection was found among children that were DENV-naïve (10/23) than among those that were DENV-immune (7/53) when vaccinated with Dengvaxia (p=0.004, Fisher's exact test), demonstrating the feasibility of the assay and algorithms in clinical practice.

Conclusion: The UH DENV1-4 NS1 IgG ELISA can determine baseline DENV serostatus among Dengvaxia recipients not only during non-acute dengue but also during breakthrough DENV infection, and has implications for assessing the long-term safety and effectiveness of Dengvaxia in the post-licensure period.

Citing Articles

Recommendations for dengue vaccine implementation in the elderly population.

Giang N, Taylor-Robinson A Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother. 2025; 13:25151355251321718.

PMID: 39963378 PMC: 11831656. DOI: 10.1177/25151355251321718.


[Vaccinations for emerging and re-emerging viral diseases].

Weichel H, Koch T Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024; 65(11):1082-1091.

PMID: 39316120 DOI: 10.1007/s00108-024-01780-6.


Detection of anti-premembrane antibody as a specific marker of four flavivirus serocomplexes and its application to serosurveillance in endemic regions.

Chen G, Dai Y, Hsieh S, Tsai J, Sy A, Jiz M Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024; 13(1):2301666.

PMID: 38163752 PMC: 10810658. DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2023.2301666.

References
1.
Wilder-Smith A, Hombach J, Ferguson N, Selgelid M, OBrien K, Vannice K . Deliberations of the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization on the use of CYD-TDV dengue vaccine. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018; 19(1):e31-e38. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30494-8. View

2.
Halstead S, Katzelnick L, Russell P, Markoff L, Aguiar M, Dans L . Ethics of a partially effective dengue vaccine: Lessons from the Philippines. Vaccine. 2020; 38(35):5572-5576. PMC: 7347470. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.079. View

3.
Guzman M, Harris E . Dengue. Lancet. 2014; 385(9966):453-65. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60572-9. View

4.
Bonaparte M, Zheng L, Garg S, Guy B, Lustig Y, Schwartz E . Evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests and conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to determine prior dengue infection. J Travel Med. 2019; 26(8). DOI: 10.1093/jtm/taz078. View

5.
Guzman M, Kouri G, Valdes L, Bravo J, Vazquez S, Halstead S . Enhanced severity of secondary dengue-2 infections: death rates in 1981 and 1997 Cuban outbreaks. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2002; 11(4):223-7. DOI: 10.1590/s1020-49892002000400003. View