» Articles » PMID: 37552457

Patterns in Wing Morphology and Fluctuating Asymmetry in Eulaema Nigrita Along an Altitudinal Gradient in the Brazilian Rupestrian Grassland

Overview
Journal Neotrop Entomol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Aug 8
PMID 37552457
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mountain ecosystems experience abrupt abiotic changes that represent environmental filters for many organisms, shaping their phenotypic expressions. However, little is known about the morphological and symmetric adjustments of native bees along altitudinal gradients. We evaluated the changes on wing morphology, wing size, and vein fluctuating asymmetry (FA) of Eulaema nigrita Lepeletier (Apidae: Euglossini) associated with climatic variables along an altitudinal gradient in the rupestrian grassland (known also as campo rupestre or rupestrian field) of Serra do Cipó, Brazil. Seven sampling points along the altitudinal gradient were selected and distributed among 800 and 1400 m.a.s.l., and then, 40 individuals of E. nigrita were collected per each altitudinal point to determine the FA levels and the morphological changes using geometric morphometric techniques. We found that the wing size of E. nigrita decreased with increasing altitude. At the highest altitudes, the levels of FA of the wing veins were greater compared to bees from lower altitudes. We detected significant changes in wing morphology along the altitudinal gradient; bees of lower altitudes showed longer and wider wings than bees of higher altitudes, which had narrower and less elongated wings. Our results show a set of morphological adjustments and phenotypic expressions in E. nigrita associated with the variation in environmental conditions along the altitudinal gradient. We highlight the importance of environmental variables as insect-stressor factors, and that FA and geometric morphometric can be excellent tools for monitoring and evaluating environmental stresses.

References
1.
Chole H, Woodard S, Bloch G . Body size variation in bees: regulation, mechanisms, and relationship to social organization. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2019; 35:77-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2019.07.006. View

2.
Chown S, Gaston K . Body size variation in insects: a macroecological perspective. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009; 85(1):139-69. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00097.x. View

3.
Del-Claro K, Torezan-Silingardi H . Insect-plant interactions: new pathways to a better comprehension of ecological communities in Neotropical savannas. Neotrop Entomol. 2009; 38(2):159-64. DOI: 10.1590/s1519-566x2009000200001. View

4.
Dellicour S, Gerard M, Prunier J, Dewulf A, Kuhlmann M, Michez D . Distribution and predictors of wing shape and size variability in three sister species of solitary bees. PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0173109. PMC: 5342212. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173109. View

5.
Diaz M, Pulido F, Moller A . Herbivore effects on developmental instability and fecundity of holm oaks. Oecologia. 2004; 139(2):224-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1491-9. View