» Articles » PMID: 37549154

Nuances in Intensity Deviant Asymmetric Responses As a Biomarker for Tinnitus

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Aug 7
PMID 37549154
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We attempted to replicate a potential tinnitus biomarker in humans based on the Sensory Precision Integrative Model of Tinnitus called the Intensity Mismatch Asymmetry. A few advances on the design were also included, including tighter matching of participants for gender, and a control stimulus frequency of 1 kHz to investigate whether any differences between control and tinnitus groups are specific to the tinnitus frequency or domain-general. The expectation was that there would be asymmetry in the MMN responses between tinnitus and control groups at the tinnitus frequency, but not at the control frequency, where the tinnitus group would have larger, more negative responses to upward deviants than downward deviants, and the control group would have the opposite pattern or lack of a deviant direction effect. However, no significant group differences were found. There was a striking difference in response amplitude to control frequency stimuli compared to tinnitus frequency stimuli, which could be an intrinsic quality of responses to these frequencies or could reflect high frequency hearing loss in the sample. Additionally, the upward deviants elicited stronger MMN responses in both groups at tinnitus frequency, but not at the control frequency. Factors contributing to these discrepant results at the tinnitus frequency could include hyperacusis, attention, and wider contextual effects of other frequencies used in the experiment (i.e. the control frequency in other blocks).

Citing Articles

Aberrant auditory prediction patterns robustly characterize tinnitus.

Reisinger L, Demarchi G, Obleser J, Sedley W, Partyka M, Schubert J Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 39854620 PMC: 11684784. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.99757.


Mismatch Negativity Unveils Tone Perception Strategies and Degrees of Tone Merging: The Case of Macau Cantonese.

Wang H, Gao F, Zhang J Brain Sci. 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39766470 PMC: 11674203. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121271.


What Do Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Responses Tell Us About Tinnitus?.

Yukhnovich E, Alter K, Sedley W J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024; 26(1):33-47.

PMID: 39681798 PMC: 11861849. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-024-00970-1.

References
1.
Auerbach B, Radziwon K, Salvi R . Testing the Central Gain Model: Loudness Growth Correlates with Central Auditory Gain Enhancement in a Rodent Model of Hyperacusis. Neuroscience. 2018; 407:93-107. PMC: 8792806. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.09.036. View

2.
Garrido M, Kilner J, Stephan K, Friston K . The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 120(3):453-63. PMC: 2671031. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.029. View

3.
Khalfa S, Dubal S, Veuillet E, Perez-Diaz F, Jouvent R, Collet L . Psychometric normalization of a hyperacusis questionnaire. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2002; 64(6):436-42. DOI: 10.1159/000067570. View

4.
Hamm J, Shymkiv Y, Han S, Yang W, Yuste R . Cortical ensembles selective for context. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(14). PMC: 8040629. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2026179118. View

5.
Zvyagintsev M, Zweerings J, Sarkheil P, Bergert S, Baqapuri H, Neuner I . Auditory mismatch processing: Role of paradigm and stimulus characteristics as detected by fMRI. Biol Psychol. 2020; 154:107887. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107887. View