Impulsivity, Gambling-Related Cognitions, Cognitive Reappraisal and Gambling Behaviour in a Malaysian Sample

Overview

Journal J Gambl Stud

Date 2023 Aug 6

PMID 37544960

Authors

Gillian Shu Lin Tan

Cai Lian Tam

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The relationships between cognitive reappraisal and problem gambling have been widely studied in different contexts. However, previous research findings remain inconsistent. This discrepancy might be attributed to the effects of interactions between cognitive reappraisal and other risk factors for problem gambling. Using moderation models, this study examined the association between impulsivity, gambling-related cognitive distortions, cognitive reappraisal and problem gambling in a sample of Malaysian gamblers. A total of 149 community gamblers (103 males, 46 females; mean age = 32.18) completed an online questionnaire. Problem gambling was measured with the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS); cognitive reappraisal was measured using the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal Subscale (ERQ-CR); impulsivity was measured with the Short-UPPS-P Impulsive Behaviour Scale (SUPPS-P); and gambling-related cognitive distortions were measured using the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS). The results revealed impulsivity and gambling-related cognitive distortions as significant predictors of problem gambling. At high levels, impulsivity and cognitive distortions are significant moderator variables that strengthen the association between cognitive reappraisal and problem gambling. These findings demonstrate that reappraisal skills could exacerbate problem gambling severity amongst impulsive or self-deceptive gamblers. Future research with larger and more representative samples is needed to validate and generalise these findings.

Citing Articles

The risk of believing that emotions are bad and uncontrollable: association with orthorexia nervosa.

Vuillier L, Greville-Harris M, Moseley R Eat Weight Disord. 2025; 30(1):8.

PMID: 39825983 PMC: 11742882. DOI: 10.1007/s40519-024-01710-3.

References

Iacobucci D, Schneider M, Popovich D, Bakamitsos G . Mean centering helps alleviate "micro" but not "macro" multicollinearity. Behav Res Methods. 2015; 48(4):1308-1317. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0624-x. View

Frijda N, Ridderinkhof K, Rietveld E . Impulsive action: emotional impulses and their control. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:518. PMC: 4040919. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00518. View

Churchwell J, Kesner R . Hippocampal-prefrontal dynamics in spatial working memory: interactions and independent parallel processing. Behav Brain Res. 2011; 225(2):389-95. PMC: 3586941. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.07.045. View

Dugre J, Giguere C, Percie du Sert O, Potvin S, Dumais A . The Psychometric Properties of a Short UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale Among Psychiatric Patients Evaluated in an Emergency Setting. Front Psychiatry. 2019; 10:139. PMC: 6442540. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00139. View

Jara-Rizzo M, Navas J, Catena A, Perales J . Types of Emotion Regulation and Their Associations with Gambling: A Cross-Sectional Study with Disordered and Non-problem Ecuadorian Gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2019; 35(3):997-1013. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-019-09868-7. View

Gross J, John O . Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 85(2):348-62. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348. View

Calado F, Alexandre J, Griffiths M . Prevalence of Adolescent Problem Gambling: A Systematic Review of Recent Research. J Gambl Stud. 2016; 33(2):397-424. PMC: 5445143. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-016-9627-5. View

Johansson A, Grant J, Kim S, Odlaug B, Gotestam K . Risk factors for problematic gambling: a critical literature review. J Gambl Stud. 2008; 25(1):67-92. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-008-9088-6. View

Kobylinska D, Kusev P . Flexible Emotion Regulation: How Situational Demands and Individual Differences Influence the Effectiveness of Regulatory Strategies. Front Psychol. 2019; 10:72. PMC: 6367256. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00072. View

10.

Dowling N, Oldenhof E, Shandley K, Youssef G, Vasiliadis S, Thomas S . The intergenerational transmission of problem gambling: The mediating role of offspring gambling expectancies and motives. Addict Behav. 2017; 77:16-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.09.003. View

11.

Loo J, Raylu N, Oei T . Gambling among the Chinese: a comprehensive review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008; 28(7):1152-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.04.001. View

12.

Goodie A, Fortune E . Measuring cognitive distortions in pathological gambling: review and meta-analyses. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013; 27(3):730-43. DOI: 10.1037/a0031892. View

13.

Tang C, Wu A, Tang J, Yan E . Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese. J Gambl Stud. 2009; 26(1):145-58. PMC: 2953627. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-009-9147-7. View

14.

Mitrovic D, Brown J . Poker mania and problem gambling: a study of distorted cognitions, motivation and alexithymia. J Gambl Stud. 2009; 25(4):489-502. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-009-9140-1. View

15.

Lambie J, Marcel A . Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience: a theoretical framework. Psychol Rev. 2002; 109(2):219-59. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.109.2.219. View

16.

Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S . Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009; 30(2):217-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004. View

17.

Liu W, Lee G, Goldweber A, Petras H, Storr C, Ialongo N . Impulsivity trajectories and gambling in adolescence among urban male youth. Addiction. 2012; 108(4):780-8. PMC: 3586388. DOI: 10.1111/add.12049. View

18.

Shin S, Hong H, Jeon S . Personality and alcohol use: the role of impulsivity. Addict Behav. 2011; 37(1):102-7. PMC: 3199946. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.09.006. View

19.

Stinchfield R . Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Addict Behav. 2002; 27(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00158-1. View

20.

DOrta I, Burnay J, Aiello D, Niolu C, Siracusano A, Timpanaro L . Development and validation of a short Italian UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Addict Behav Rep. 2018; 2:19-22. PMC: 5845970. DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2015.04.003. View