» Articles » PMID: 37542550

Implementing Precision Oncology for Sarcoma Patients: the CCCmolecular Tumor Board Experience

Abstract

Purpose: Due to poor outcomes and limited treatment options, patients with advanced bone and soft tissue sarcomas (BS/STS) may undergo comprehensive molecular profiling of tumor samples to identify possible therapeutic targets. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of routine molecular profiling in the setting of a dedicated precision oncology program in patients with BS/STS in a German large-volume sarcoma center.

Methods: 92 BS/STS patients who received comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and were subsequently discussed in our molecular tumor board (MTB) between 2016 and 2022 were included. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed, and the clinical impact of NGS-related findings was analyzed.

Results: 89.1% of patients had received at least one treatment line before NGS testing. At least one molecular alteration was found in 71 patients (82.6%). The most common alterations were mutations in TP53 (23.3% of patients), followed by PIK3CA and MDM2 mutations (9.3% each). Druggable alterations were identified, and treatment recommended in 32 patients (37.2%). Of those patients with actionable alterations, ten patients (31.2%) received personalized treatment and six patients did benefit from molecular-based therapy in terms of a progression-free survival ratio (PFSr) > 1.3.

Conclusion: Our single-center experience shows an increasing uptake of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and highlights current challenges of implementing precision oncology in the management of patients with BS/STS. A relevant number of patients were diagnosed with clinically actionable alterations. Our results highlight the potential benefit of NGS in patients with rare cancers and currently limited therapeutic options.

Citing Articles

Current challenges and practical aspects of molecular pathology for bone and soft tissue tumors.

de Alava E Virchows Arch. 2024; 484(2):353-367.

PMID: 38228904 PMC: 10948576. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-024-03736-5.

References
1.
Gennari A, Andre F, Barrios C, Cortes J, de Azambuja E, DeMichele A . ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021; 32(12):1475-1495. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.019. View

2.
Horak P, Heining C, Kreutzfeldt S, Hutter B, Mock A, Hullein J . Comprehensive Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis for Guiding Therapeutic Decisions in Patients with Rare Cancers. Cancer Discov. 2021; 11(11):2780-2795. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0126. View

3.
Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, Shah M, Shapira-Frommer R, Nakagawa K . Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21(10):1353-1365. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30445-9. View

4.
Van Glabbeke M, Van Oosterom A, Oosterhuis J, Mouridsen H, Crowther D, Somers R . Prognostic factors for the outcome of chemotherapy in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of 2,185 patients treated with anthracycline-containing first-line regimens--a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and.... J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(1):150-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.150. View

5.
Lucchesi C, Khalifa E, Laizet Y, Soubeyran I, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Chomienne C . Targetable Alterations in Adult Patients With Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: Insights for Personalized Therapy. JAMA Oncol. 2018; 4(10):1398-1404. PMC: 6233783. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0723. View