» Articles » PMID: 37540659

Perceived Dignity is an Unrecognized Source of Emotional Distress in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: Results from the Validation of the Mexican Version of the Patient Dignity Inventory

Abstract

Introduction: Dignity has rarely been explored in patients with rheumatic diseases (RMDs), which contrasts with patients´ observations that dignity is a relevant area for research focus. The study's primary objective was to adapt and validate the Mexican version of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-Mx) in patients with RMDs, and to estimate the proportion of patients with distress related to perceived dignity (DPD) assessed with the PDI-Mx.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was developed in 2 phases. Phase 1 consisted of pilot testing and questionnaire feasibility (n = 50 patients), PDI-Mx content validity (experts' agreement), construct validity (exploratory factor analysis), discriminant validity (Heterotrait-Monotrait correlations' rate [HTMT]), criterion validity (Spearman correlations) and PDI-Mx reliability with internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest (intra-class correlation coefficients [ICC]) in 220 additional outpatients (among whom 30 underwent test-retest). Phase 2 consisted of quantifying DPD (PDI-Mx cut-off ≥54.4) in 290 outpatients with RMDs.

Results: Overall, patients were representative of typical outpatients with RMDs from a National tertiary care level center. The 25-item PDI-Mx was found feasible, valid (experts' agreement ≥82%; a 4-factor structure accounted for 68.7% of the total variance; HTMT = 0.608; the strength of the correlations was moderate to high between the PDI-Mx, the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress scale dimensions scores, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index score) and reliable (Cronbach's ɑ = 0.962, ICC = 0.939 [95%CI = 0.913-0.961]). DPD was present in 78 patients (26.9%).

Conclusions: The PDI-Mx questionnaire showed good psychometric properties for assessing DPD in our population. Perceived dignity in patients with RMDs might be an unrecognized source of emotional distress.

Citing Articles

Perceived mistreatment in patients with rheumatic diseases: The impact of the underlying diagnosis.

Contreras-Yanez I, Ledon-Llanes L, Guaracha-Basanez G, Sanchez-Hernandez A, Ortiz-Haro A, Pascual-Ramos V PLoS One. 2025; 19(12):e0316312.

PMID: 39775374 PMC: 11684605. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316312.


Lupus and other autoimmune diseases: Epidemiology in the population of African ancestry and diagnostic and management challenges in Africa.

Essouma M, Noubiap J J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024; 3(4):100288.

PMID: 39282618 PMC: 11399606. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100288.

References
1.
Pincus T, Bergman M, Yazici Y . RAPID3-an index of physical function, pain, and global status as "vital signs" to improve care for people with chronic rheumatic diseases. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009; 67(2):211-25. View

2.
Ekpenyong M, Nyashanu M, Ossey-Nweze C, Serrant L . Exploring the perceptions of dignity among patients and nurses in hospital and community settings: an integrative review. J Res Nurs. 2022; 26(6):517-537. PMC: 8899300. DOI: 10.1177/1744987121997890. View

3.
Tsang S, Royse C, Terkawi A . Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017; 11(Suppl 1):S80-S89. PMC: 5463570. DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17. View

4.
Juuso P, Skar L, Olsson M, Soderberg S . Meanings of being received and met by others as experienced by women with fibromyalgia. Qual Health Res. 2014; 24(10):1381-90. DOI: 10.1177/1049732314547540. View

5.
Fuseini A, Ley L, Rawson H, Redley B, Kerr D . A systematic review of patient-reported dignity and dignified care during acute hospital admission. J Adv Nurs. 2022; 78(11):3540-3558. PMC: 9795980. DOI: 10.1111/jan.15370. View