» Articles » PMID: 37540293

Human Head and Helmet Interface Friction Coefficients with Biological Sex and Hair Property Comparisons

Overview
Journal Ann Biomed Eng
Date 2023 Aug 4
PMID 37540293
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dummy headforms used for impact testing have changed little over the years, and frictional characteristics are thought not to represent the human head accurately. The frictional interface between the helmet and head is an essential factor affecting impact response. However, few studies have evaluated the coefficient of friction (COF) between the human head and helmet surface. This study's objectives were to quantify the human head's static and dynamic COF and evaluate the effect of biological sex and hair properties. Seventy-four participants slid their heads along a piece of helmet foam backed by a fixed load cell at varying normal force levels. As normal force increased, static and dynamic human head COF decreased following power-law curves. At 80 N, the static COF is 0.32 (95% CI 0.30-0.34), and the dynamic friction coefficient is 0.27 (95% CI 0.26-0.28). Biological sex and hair properties were determined not to affect human head COF. The COFs between the head and helmet surface should be used to develop more biofidelic head impact testing methods, define boundary conditions for computer simulations, and aid decision-making for helmet designs.

Citing Articles

How Well Do Popular Bicycle Helmets Protect from Different Types of Head Injury?.

Baker C, Yu X, Lovell B, Tan R, Patel S, Ghajari M Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 52(12):3326-3364.

PMID: 39294466 PMC: 11561050. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03589-8.


The Influence of Headform Friction and Inertial Properties on Oblique Impact Helmet Testing.

Stark N, Begonia M, Viano L, Rowson S Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 52(10):2803-2811.

PMID: 38421478 PMC: 11402858. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03460-w.

References
1.
Milne G, Deck C, Carreira R, Allinne Q, Willinger R . Development and validation of a bicycle helmet: assessment of head injury risk under standard impact conditions. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2012; 15 Suppl 1:309-10. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2012.713623. View

2.
Finan J, Nightingale R, Myers B . The influence of reduced friction on head injury metrics in helmeted head impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2008; 9(5):483-8. DOI: 10.1080/15389580802272427. View

3.
Rowson S, Duma S . Brain injury prediction: assessing the combined probability of concussion using linear and rotational head acceleration. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013; 41(5):873-82. PMC: 3624001. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-012-0731-0. View

4.
Seo N, Armstrong T, Drinkaus P . A comparison of two methods of measuring static coefficient of friction at low normal forces: a pilot study. Ergonomics. 2009; 52(1):121-35. DOI: 10.1080/00140130802238622. View

5.
Sivamani R, Wu G, Gitis N, Maibach H . Tribological testing of skin products: gender, age, and ethnicity on the volar forearm. Skin Res Technol. 2003; 9(4):299-305. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0846.2003.00034.x. View