» Articles » PMID: 37539639

The Prevalence of Treatment-emergent Central Sleep Apnea with Mandibular Advancement Device Therapy

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2023 Aug 4
PMID 37539639
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Objectives: Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) describes the appearance or persistence of central sleep apnea while undergoing treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. TECSA is well studied in continuous positive airway pressure therapy with an estimated prevalence of 8%. Based on a few case reports, mandibular advancement devices (MAD) may also provoke TECSA. This study aims to gain insight into the prevalence of TECSA with MAD therapy.

Methods: This retrospective study includes a total of 129 patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea who were treated with a custom-made titratable MAD. Baseline and follow-up sleep studies were compared to identify patients with TECSA. Since different diagnostic criteria to define TECSA are used in literature, prevalence was calculated according to three definitions (TECSA-1, -2, and -3). Demographics, MAD treatment variables, and findings of the diagnostic polysomnography were compared between TECSA and non-TECSA patients to identify possible predictors.

Results: Depending on the definition used, TECSA was found in 3.1%-7.8% of patients undergoing MAD therapy. TECSA patients had a higher apnea index (9.2 vs 2.0 events/h, = .042), central apnea-hypopnea index (4.1 vs 0.2 events/h, = .045) and oxygen desaturation index (23.9 vs 16.3 events/h, = .018) at baseline compared to non-TECSA patients. No differences were found in demographics and treatment variables.

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that TECSA also occurs in patients starting MAD treatment. Patients with TECSA had a higher apnea index, central apnea-hypopnea index, and oxygen desaturation index at baseline compared to non-TECSA patients.

Citation: Hellemans S, Van de Perck E, Braem MJ, Verbraecken J, Dieltjens M, Vanderveken OM. The prevalence of treatment-emergent central sleep apnea with mandibular advancement device therapy. . 2023;19(12):2035-2041.

Citing Articles

Central sleep apnoea: not just one phenotype.

Randerath W, Baillieul S, Tamisier R Eur Respir Rev. 2024; 33(171).

PMID: 38537948 PMC: 10966472. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0141-2023.

References
1.
Berry R, Budhiraja R, Gottlieb D, Gozal D, Iber C, Kapur V . Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012; 8(5):597-619. PMC: 3459210. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.2172. View

2.
Stanchina M, Robinson K, Corrao W, Donat W, Sands S, Malhotra A . Clinical Use of Loop Gain Measures to Determine Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Efficacy in Patients with Complex Sleep Apnea. A Pilot Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015; 12(9):1351-7. PMC: 5467091. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201410-469BC. View

3.
Gay P . Complex sleep apnea: it really is a disease. J Clin Sleep Med. 2008; 4(5):403-5. PMC: 2576323. View

4.
Muza R . Central sleep apnoea-a clinical review. J Thorac Dis. 2015; 7(5):930-7. PMC: 4454847. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.04.45. View

5.
Liu D, Armitstead J, Benjafield A, Shao S, Malhotra A, Cistulli P . Trajectories of Emergent Central Sleep Apnea During CPAP Therapy. Chest. 2017; 152(4):751-760. PMC: 6026232. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.06.010. View