Manual Dexterity in School-age Children Measured by the Grooved Pegboard Test: Evaluation of Training Effect and Performance in Dual-task

Overview

Journal Heliyon

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2023 Aug 4

PMID 37539174

Authors

Valerio Giustino

Antonino Patti

Luca Petrigna

Flavia Figlioli

Ewan Thomas

Vincenza Costa

Luigi Galvano

Jessica Brusa

Domenico Savio Salvatore Vicari

Simona Pajaujiene

Daniela Smirni

Antonio Palma

Antonino Bianco

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Manual dexterity is the ability to manipulate objects using the hands and fingers for a specific task. Although manual dexterity is widely investigated in the general and special population at all ages, numerous aspects still remain to be explored in children. The aim of this study was to assess the presence of the training effect of the execution of the Grooved Pegboard test (GPT) and to measure the performance of the GPT in dual-task (DT), i.e., during a motor task and a cognitive task.

Methods: In this observational, cross-sectional study manual dexterity was assessed in children aged between 6 and 8. The procedure consisted of two phases: (1) the execution of five consecutive trials of the GPT to evaluate the training effect; (2) the execution of one trial of the GPT associated with a motor task (finger tapping test, GPT-FTT), and one trial of the GPT associated with a cognitive task (counting test, GPT-CT) to evaluate the performance in DT.

Results: As for the training effect, a significant difference (p < 0.001) between the five trials of the GPT (i.e., GPT1, GPT2, GPT3, GPT4, GPT5) was detected. In particular, we found a significant difference between GPT1 and GPT3 (p < 0.05), GPT1 and GPT4 (p < 0.001), and GPT1 and GPT5 (p < 0.001), as well as between GPT2 and GPT4 (p < 0.001), and GPT2 and GPT5 (p < 0.001).As for the performance in DT, no differences between the best trial of the GPT (i.e., GPT5) and both the GPT-FTT and GPT-CT was found.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the execution of the GPT in children has a training effect up to the third consecutive trial. Furthermore, the administration of the GPT in DT does not affect GPT performance.

Citing Articles

The impact of sports experience on manual dexterity performances in school-age children.

Patti A, Vicari D, Giustino V, Figlioli F, Seidita G, Montalto Monella A Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41421.

PMID: 39834414 PMC: 11742816. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41421.

Epidemiology and management of motorbike chain-related fingertip injuries: A retrospective study at B&B Hospital, Kathmandu.

Jaiswal S, Shrestha O, Regmi S, Batajoo S, Shrestha N, Banskota A Heliyon. 2024; 10(15):e35606.

PMID: 39170155 PMC: 11336863. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35606.

Predictability and Complexity of Fine and Gross Motor Skills in Fibromyalgia Patients: A Pilot Study.

Brigida N, Catela D, Merce C, Branco M Sports (Basel). 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38668558 PMC: 11053813. DOI: 10.3390/sports12040090.

Young basketball players have better manual dexterity performance than sportsmen and non-sportsmen of the same age: a cross-sectional study.

Amato A, Giustino V, Patti A, Proia P, Trivic T, Drid P Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20953.

PMID: 38017046 PMC: 10684493. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48335-7.

References

Wang Y, Magasi S, Bohannon R, Reuben D, McCreath H, Bubela D . Assessing dexterity function: a comparison of two alternatives for the NIH Toolbox. J Hand Ther. 2011; 24(4):313-20. PMC: 3783205. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2011.05.001. View

Ramos-Alvarez O, Arufe-Giraldez V, Sanmiguel-Rodriguez A, Navarro-Paton R . Variations in Manual Dexterity in 11- and 12-Year-Old Children in the North of Spain in the SARS-CoV-2 Lockdown. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(12). PMC: 9223041. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127162. View

Nishi Y, Nobusako S, Tsujimoto T, Sakai A, Nakai A, Morioka S . Spatial Instability during Precision Grip-Lift in Children with Poor Manual Dexterity. Brain Sci. 2022; 12(5). PMC: 9139501. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12050598. View

Adi-Japha E, Berke R, Shaya N, Julius M . Different post-training processes in children's and adults' motor skill learning. PLoS One. 2019; 14(1):e0210658. PMC: 6328138. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210658. View

Turesky T, Olulade O, Luetje M, Eden G . An fMRI study of finger tapping in children and adults. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018; 39(8):3203-3215. PMC: 6052794. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24070. View

OLDFIELD R . The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971; 9(1):97-113. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4. View

Suhaili I, Harun D, Kadar M, Hanif Farhan M, Nur Sakinah B, Evelyn Jong T . Motor performance and functional mobility in children with specific learning disabilities. Med J Malaysia. 2019; 74(1):34-39. View

Parmar P, Patton J . Models of Motor Learning Generalization. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018; 2018:4714-4719. PMC: 8767419. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513182. View

Ziereis S, Jansen P . Effects of physical activity on executive function and motor performance in children with ADHD. Res Dev Disabil. 2015; 38:181-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.005. View

10.

Gu M, Kong H . Improvement in Fine Manual Dexterity in Children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 2 after Nusinersen Injection: A Case Series. Children (Basel). 2021; 8(11). PMC: 8623735. DOI: 10.3390/children8111039. View

11.

Dayan E, Cohen L . Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron. 2011; 72(3):443-54. PMC: 3217208. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.008. View

12.

Ljubisavljevic M, Oommen J, Filipovic S, Bjekic J, Szolics M, Nagelkerke N . Effects of tDCS of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Dual-Task Performance Involving Manual Dexterity and Cognitive Task in Healthy Older Adults. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019; 11:144. PMC: 6592113. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00144. View

13.

Sobinov A, Bensmaia S . The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021; 22(12):741-757. PMC: 9169115. DOI: 10.1038/s41583-021-00528-7. View

14.

Petrigna L, Pajaujiene S, Iacona G, Thomas E, Paoli A, Bianco A . The execution of the Grooved Pegboard test in a Dual-Task situation: A pilot study. Heliyon. 2020; 6(8):e04678. PMC: 7426567. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04678. View

15.

Ashtamker L, Karni A . Motor memory in childhood: early expression of consolidation phase gains. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2013; 106:26-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.07.003. View

16.

Yancosek K, Howell D . A narrative review of dexterity assessments. J Hand Ther. 2009; 22(3):258-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2008.11.004. View

17.

Wollesen B, Janssen T, Muller H, Voelcker-Rehage C . Effects of cognitive-motor dual task training on cognitive and physical performance in healthy children and adolescents: A scoping review. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022; 224:103498. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103498. View

18.

Liu T, Kelly J, Davis L, Zamora K . Nutrition, BMI and Motor Competence in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019; 55(5). PMC: 6572175. DOI: 10.3390/medicina55050135. View

19.

Liu C, Marie D, Fredrick A, Bertram J, Utley K, Fess E . Predicting hand function in older adults: evaluations of grip strength, arm curl strength, and manual dexterity. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2016; 29(4):753-760. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-016-0628-0. View

20.

Flatters I, Mushtaq F, Hill L, Holt R, Wilkie R, Mon-Williams M . The relationship between a child's postural stability and manual dexterity. Exp Brain Res. 2014; 232(9):2907-17. PMC: 4131166. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3947-4. View