» Articles » PMID: 37536671

Modern Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy in Patients with Cardiomyopathies and Channelopathies: Data from a Large Multicentre Registry

Abstract

Aims: Patients with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies are usually younger and have a predominantly arrhythmia-related prognosis; they have nearly normal life expectancy thanks to the protection against sudden cardiac death provided by the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is an effective alternative to the transvenous ICD and has evolved over the years. This study aimed to evaluate the rate of inappropriate shocks (IS), appropriate therapies, and device-related complications in patients with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies who underwent modern S-ICD implantation.

Methods And Results: We enrolled consecutive patients with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies who had undergone implantation of a modern S-ICD from January 2016 to December 2020 and who were followed up until December 2022. A total of 1338 S-ICD implantations were performed within the observation period. Of these patients, 628 had cardiomyopathies or channelopathies. The rate of IS at 12 months was 4.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.8-6.9] in patients with cardiomyopathies and 1.1% (95% CI: 0.1-3.8) in patients with channelopathies (P = 0.032). No significant differences were noted over a median follow-up of 43 months [hazard ratio (HR): 0.76; 95% CI: 0.45-1.31; P = 0.351]. The rate of appropriate shocks at 12 months was 2.3% (95% CI: 1.1-4.1) in patients with cardiomyopathies and 2.1% (95% CI: 0.6-5.3) in patients with channelopathies (P = 1.0). The rate of device-related complications was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.3-2.3) and 3.2% (95% CI: 1.2-6.8), respectively (P = 0.074). No significant differences were noted over the entire follow-up. The need for pacing was low, occurring in 0.8% of patients.

Conclusion: Modern S-ICDs may be a valuable alternative to transvenous ICDs in patients with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies. Our findings suggest that modern S-ICD therapy carries a low rate of IS.

Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/Identifier: NCT02275637.

Citing Articles

Clinical performance of subcutaneous vs. transvenous implantable defibrillator in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: .

Russo V, Caturano A, Bianchi V, Rago A, Ammendola E, Papa A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 12:1539125.

PMID: 40046959 PMC: 11880277. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1539125.


Substrates of Sudden Cardiac Death in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Sclafani M, Falasconi G, Tini G, Musumeci B, Penela D, Saglietto A J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004861 PMC: 11857077. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041331.


The risk of failure of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: from PRAETORIAN score to clinical practice.

Ziacchi M, Ottaviano L, Checchi L, Viani S, Nigro G, Bianchi V Europace. 2025; 27(2).

PMID: 39834232 PMC: 11822678. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaf011.


A case of pioneering subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator intervention in Timothy syndrome.

Zhang Z, Wu K, Wu Z, Xiao Y, Wang Y, Lin Q BMC Pediatr. 2024; 24(1):729.

PMID: 39533234 PMC: 11558885. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-05216-w.


Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in paediatric patients for primary vs. secondary prevention.

Thuraiaiyah J, Philbert B, Jensen A, Xing L, Joergensen T, Lim C Europace. 2024; 26(9).

PMID: 39345160 PMC: 11440178. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae245.


References
1.
Maron B, Towbin J, Thiene G, Antzelevitch C, Corrado D, Arnett D . Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and.... Circulation. 2006; 113(14):1807-16. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.174287. View

2.
Kilani M, Jacon P, Badenco N, Marquie C, Ollitrault P, Behar N . Pre-implant predictors of inappropriate shocks with the third-generation subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Europace. 2022; 24(12):1952-1959. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac134. View

3.
Olde Nordkamp L, Wilde A, Tijssen J, Knops R, van Dessel P, de Groot J . The ICD for primary prevention in patients with inherited cardiac diseases: indications, use, and outcome: a comparison with secondary prevention. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6(1):91-100. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.975268. View

4.
Priori S, Wilde A, Horie M, Cho Y, Behr E, Berul C . Executive summary: HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes. Europace. 2013; 15(10):1389-406. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut272. View

5.
Conte G, Kawabata M, de Asmundis C, Taravelli E, Petracca F, Ruggiero D . High rate of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator sensing screening failure in patients with Brugada syndrome: a comparison with other inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes. Europace. 2017; 20(7):1188-1193. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux009. View