» Articles » PMID: 37535846

COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-making in Remote Alaska Between November 2020 and November 2021

Overview
Date 2023 Aug 3
PMID 37535846
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is an ongoing barrier to achieve sufficient COVID-19 vaccination coverage. Although there are many studies globally of vaccine hesitancy based on large survey samples, there are fewer in-depth qualitative studies that explore vaccine hesitancy and acceptance as a spectrum of decision-making. In this paper, we begin to describe vaccination decision-making among 58 adults living in remote Alaska based on three waves of online surveys and follow-up semi-structured interviews conducted between November 2020 and November 2021. The survey question of intention was not a predictor of adoption for about one third of the interviewees who were unvaccinated when they took the survey (n=12, 35%). Over half of all interviewees (n=37, 64%) had vaccine-related concerns, including 25 vaccinated individuals (representing 57% of vaccinated interviewees). Most interviewees reported that they learned about COVID-19 vaccines through interpersonal interactions (n=30, 52%) and/or a variety of media sources (n=29, 50%). The major facilitators of acceptance were trust in the information source (n=20, 48% of the 42 who responded), and learning from the experiences of family, friends, and the broader community (n=12, 29%). Further, trust and having a sense of agency appears to be important to interviewee decision-making, regardless of vaccination status and intention.

Citing Articles

Determinants of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance based on the novel Omale INDEPT FORCIS Framework and recommendations for subsequent pandemics: a qualitative study among community members in Ebonyi state, Nigeria.

Omale U, Adeke A, Oka O, Ikegwuonu C, Iyare O, Nnachi O Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):223.

PMID: 39468612 PMC: 11520843. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02284-3.


Beyond COVID: towards a transdisciplinary synthesis for understanding responses and developing pandemic preparedness in Alaska.

van Doren T, Brown R, Chi G, Cochran P, Cueva K, Eichelberger L Int J Circumpolar Health. 2024; 83(1):2404273.

PMID: 39283062 PMC: 11407410. DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2024.2404273.


A qualitative exploration of the impacts of COVID-19 in two rural Southwestern Alaska communities.

Cueva K, Peterson M, Chaliak A, Young R Int J Circumpolar Health. 2024; 83(1):2313823.

PMID: 38563298 PMC: 10989197. DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2024.2313823.


Factors associated with receiving an initial COVID-19 vaccine among Alaskan residents: results from an online cross-sectional survey.

Garcia G, Meyer J, Edwards A, Cameron D Int J Circumpolar Health. 2023; 82(1):2252604.

PMID: 37652714 PMC: 10478585. DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2023.2252604.

References
1.
Doherty I, Pilkington W, Brown L, Billings V, Hoffler U, Paulin L . COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in underserved communities of North Carolina. PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0248542. PMC: 8559933. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248542. View

2.
Bennett N, Bloom D, Ferranna M . Factors underlying COVID-19 vaccine and booster hesitancy and refusal, and incentivizing vaccine adoption. PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0274529. PMC: 9498968. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274529. View

3.
Purvis R, Hallgren E, Moore R, Willis D, Hall S, Gurel-Headley M . Trusted Sources of COVID-19 Vaccine Information among Hesitant Adopters in the United States. Vaccines (Basel). 2021; 9(12). PMC: 8706404. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9121418. View

4.
Mondal P, Sinharoy A, Su L . Sociodemographic predictors of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: a nationwide US-based survey study. Public Health. 2021; 198:252-259. PMC: 8318686. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.07.028. View

5.
Simmons L, Whipps M, Phipps J, Satish N, Swamy G . Understanding COVID-19 vaccine uptake during pregnancy: 'Hesitance', knowledge, and evidence-based decision-making. Vaccine. 2022; 40(19):2755-2760. PMC: 8947956. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.03.044. View