» Articles » PMID: 37535267

Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy: Long-Term Follow-Up, Surveillance Recommendations, and Multidisciplinary Risk Factors

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Aug 3
PMID 37535267
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Early detection and intervention for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) significantly decreases progression to persistent BCRL (pBCRL). We aimed to provide long-term follow-up on our early detection with bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and early home intervention demonstrating reduced pBCRL to guide surveillance recommendations.

Patients And Methods: In total, 148 female patients with breast cancer who had axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) from November 2014 to December 2017 were analyzed. Baseline BIS measurements and postoperative follow-up occurred every 3 months for 1 year, biannual for 1 year, and then annually. An elevated BIS triggered evaluation and initiation of at-home interventions with reassessment for resolution versus persistent BCRL (pBCRL). High-risk factors and timing were analyzed.

Results: Mean follow-up was 55 months, and 65 (44%) patients had an abnormal BIS. Of these, 54 (82%) resolved with home intervention. The overall pBCRL rate was 8%. Average time to first abnormal BIS was 11.7 months. None of the stage 0 patients (0/34) and only 5/25 (20%) of stage 1 patients had pBCRL. All of stage 2 and stage 3 patients (7/7) had pBCRL. pBCRL correlated with number of positive nodes, percentage of positive nodes, stage of lymphedema at diagnosis, and recurring abnormal BIS measurements (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: We have shown that patients undergoing ALND with early BCRL identified by BIS who performed home interventions had an 8% pBCRL rate. Patients at high risk for pBCRL should have routine surveillance starting at 9 months postoperatively to identify an opportunity for early intervention.

References
1.
Siegel R, Miller K, Fuchs H, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022; 72(1):7-33. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21708. View

2.
Zhang X, Oliveri J, Paskett E . Features, Predictors, and Treatment of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2021; 12(4):244-254. PMC: 8130904. DOI: 10.1007/s12609-020-00381-0. View

3.
McLaughlin S, Staley A, Vicini F, Thiruchelvam P, Hutchison N, Mendez J . Considerations for Clinicians in the Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Expert ASBrS Panel : Part 1: Definitions, Assessments, Education, and Future Directions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017; 24(10):2818-2826. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-5982-4. View

4.
Lawenda B, Mondry T, Johnstone P . Lymphedema: a primer on the identification and management of a chronic condition in oncologic treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009; 59(1):8-24. DOI: 10.3322/caac.20001. View

5.
De Vrieze T, Gebruers N, Nevelsteen I, Tjalma W, Thomis S, De Groef A . Breast cancer-related lymphedema and its treatment: how big is the financial impact?. Support Care Cancer. 2020; 29(7):3801-3813. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05890-3. View