» Articles » PMID: 37533595

Effectiveness of Cognitive Rehabilitation on Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Teleneuropsychology

Abstract

Objectives: To measure the effects of cognitive telerehabilitation on cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and memory strategies in a cohort of patients with mild cognitive impairment.

Methods: A sample of 60 patients with mild cognitive impairment according to Petersen's criteria was randomly divided into two groups: 30 treatment cases and 30 controls (waiting list group). Subjects were matched by age, sex, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment. The treatment group received ten cognitive telerehabilitation sessions of 45 minutes duration once a week. Pre-treatment (week 0) and post-treatment (week 10) measures were assessed for both groups. Different linear mixed models were estimated to test treatment effect (cognitive telerehabilitation vs. controls) on each outcome of interest over time (pre/post-intervention).

Results: A significant group (control/treatment) x time (pre/post) interaction revealed that the treatment group at week 10 had better scores in cognitive variables: memory (RAVLT learning trials p=0.030; RAVLT delayed recall p=0.029), phonological fluency (p=0.001), activities of daily living (FAQ p=0.001), satisfaction with memory performance (MMQ satisfaction p=0.004) and use of memory strategies (MMQ strategy p=0.000), as well as, and a significant reduction of affective symptomatology: depression (GDS p=0.000), neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPI-Q p=0.045), forgetfulness (EDO-10 p=0.000), and stress (DAS stress p=0.000).

Conclusions: Our study suggests that CTR is an effective intervention.

Citing Articles

A systematic review of cognitive telerehabilitation in patients with cognitive dysfunction.

Jeon H, Kim D, Park S, Lee B, Han H, Jeon N Front Neurol. 2025; 15:1450977.

PMID: 39882355 PMC: 11774910. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1450977.


Five Digit Test in neuropsychological assessment of working memory in aged individuals:normative data.

Cecato J Dement Neuropsychol. 2024; 18:e20240141.

PMID: 39258163 PMC: 11386523. DOI: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2024-0141.


Impact of AI-Powered Solutions in Rehabilitation Process: Recent Improvements and Future Trends.

Khalid U, Naeem M, Stasolla F, Syed M, Abbas M, Coronato A Int J Gen Med. 2024; 17:943-969.

PMID: 38495919 PMC: 10944308. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S453903.

References
1.
Mantovani E, Zucchella C, Bottiroli S, Federico A, Giugno R, Sandrini G . Telemedicine and Virtual Reality for Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Roadmap for the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Neurol. 2020; 11:926. PMC: 7522345. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00926. View

2.
Peng Z, Jiang H, Wang X, Huang K, Zuo Y, Wu X . The Efficacy of Cognitive Training for Elderly Chinese Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019:4347281. PMC: 6907055. DOI: 10.1155/2019/4347281. View

3.
Crivelli L, Quiroz Y, Calandri I, Martin M, Velilla L, Cusicanqui M . Working Group Recommendations for the Practice of Teleneuropsychology in Latin America. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2021; 37(3):553-567. PMC: 8574290. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acab080. View

4.
Teixeira C, Gobbi L, Corazza D, Stella F, Costa J, Gobbi S . Non-pharmacological interventions on cognitive functions in older people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011; 54(1):175-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.02.014. View

5.
Sherman D, Mauser J, Nuno M, Sherzai D . The Efficacy of Cognitive Intervention in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): a Meta-Analysis of Outcomes on Neuropsychological Measures. Neuropsychol Rev. 2017; 27(4):440-484. PMC: 5754430. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-017-9363-3. View