» Articles » PMID: 37533376

Spinal Cord Motion and CSF Flow in the Cervical Spine of 70 Healthy Participants

Overview
Journal NMR Biomed
Publisher Wiley
Date 2023 Aug 3
PMID 37533376
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pulsatile spinal cord and CSF velocities related to the cardiac cycle can be depicted by phase-contrast MRI. Among patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension, we have recently described relevant differences compared with healthy controls in segment C2/C3. The method might be a promising tool to solve clinical and diagnostic ambiguities. Therefore, it is important to understand the physiological range and the effects of clinical and anatomical parameters in healthy volunteers. Within a prospective study, 3D T-weighted MRI for spinal canal anatomy and cardiac-gated phase-contrast MRI adapted to CSF flow and spinal cord motion for time-resolved velocity data and derivatives were performed in 70 participants (age 20-79 years) in segments C2/C3 and C5/C6. Correlations were analyzed by multiple linear regression models; p < 0.01 was required to assume a significant impact of clinical or anatomical data quantified by the regression coefficient B. Data showed that in C2/C3, the CSF and spinal cord craniocaudal velocity ranges were 4.5 ± 0.9 and 0.55 ± 0.15 cm/s; the total displacements were 1.1 ± 0.3 and 0.07 ± 0.02 cm, respectively. The craniocaudal range of the CSF flow rate was 8.6 ± 2.4 mL/s; the CSF stroke volume was 2.1 ± 0.7 mL. In C5/C5, physiological narrowing of the spinal canal caused higher CSF velocity ranges and lower stroke volume (C5/C6 B = +1.64 cm/s, p < 0.001; B = -0.4 mL, p = 0.002, respectively). Aging correlated to lower spinal cord motion (e.g., B = -0.01 cm per 10 years of aging, p < 0.001). Increased diastolic blood pressure was associated with lower spinal cord motion and CSF flow parameters (e.g., C2/C3 CSF stroke volume B = -0.3 mL per 10 mmHg, p < 0.001). Males showed higher CSF flow and spinal cord motion (e.g., CSF stroke volume B = +0.5 mL, p < 0.001; total displacement spinal cord B = +0.016 cm, p = 0.002). We therefore propose to stratify data for age and sex and to adjust for diastolic blood pressure and segmental narrowing in future clinical studies.

Citing Articles

Cerebrospinal fluid pressure dynamics as a biomechanical marker for quantification of spinal cord compression: Conceptual framework and systematic review of clinical trials.

Kheram N, Bessen M, Jones C, Davies B, Kotter M, Farshad M Brain Spine. 2025; 5:104211.

PMID: 40041396 PMC: 11879606. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104211.


The impact of body position on neurofluid dynamics: present insights and advancements in imaging.

Muccio M, Sun Z, Chu D, Damadian B, Minkoff L, Bonanni L Front Aging Neurosci. 2024; 16:1454282.

PMID: 39582951 PMC: 11582045. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1454282.


Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics Analysis Using Time-Spatial Labeling Inversion Pulse (Time-SLIP) Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Mice.

Tomita Y, Yagi M, Seki F, Komaki Y, Matsumoto M, Nakamura M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(15).

PMID: 39124818 PMC: 11312514. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154550.


The Pressure of Headache at the United Kingdom CSF Disorders Day 2023.

Berman G, Mollan S Neuroophthalmology. 2024; 48(3):204-209.

PMID: 38756340 PMC: 11095568. DOI: 10.1080/01658107.2023.2290539.


Non-invasive biomarkers for spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) through phase-contrast MRI.

Wolf K, Volz F, Lutzen N, Mast H, Reisert M, El Rahal A J Neurol. 2024; 271(7):4336-4347.

PMID: 38643444 PMC: 11233306. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12365-6.