» Articles » PMID: 37531086

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19: A Multicenter Matched Cohort Study

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure due to COVID-19 is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an attractive management option. This study sought to determine the effect of ECMO on hospital mortality and discharge condition in this population. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study to emulate a pragmatic targeted trial comparing ECMO to mechanical ventilation without ECMO for severe COVID-19. Data were gathered from a large hospital network database in the US. Adults admitted with COVID-19 were included if they were managed with ECMO or mechanical ventilation for severe hypoxemia and excluded if they had significant comorbidities or lacked functional independence on admission. The groups underwent coarsened exact matching on multiple clinical variables. The primary outcome was adjusted in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included ventilator days, intensive care days, and discharge destination. A total of 278 ECMO patients were matched to 2,054 comparison patients. Adjusted in-hospital mortality was significantly less in the ECMO group (38.8% vs. 60.1%, p < 0.001). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was associated with higher rates of liberation from mechanical ventilation, intensive care discharge, and favorable discharge destination. These findings support the use of ECMO for well-selected patients with severe acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19.

Citing Articles

In COVID-19 Patients Supported with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, Intensive Care Unit Mortality Is Associated with the Blood Transfusion Rate.

Makhoul M, Dann E, Mashiach T, Pikovsky O, Lorusso R, Eisa J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685839 PMC: 11642409. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237381.


Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection.

Ruck J, Bush E Adv Surg. 2024; 58(1):249-273.

PMID: 39089781 PMC: 11294677. DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2024.05.003.

References
1.
Urner M, Barnett A, Li Bassi G, Brodie D, Dalton H, Ferguson N . Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with acute covid-19 associated respiratory failure: comparative effectiveness study. BMJ. 2022; 377:e068723. PMC: 9065544. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068723. View

2.
Rice T, Wheeler A, Bernard G, Hayden D, Schoenfeld D, Ware L . Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. Chest. 2007; 132(2):410-7. DOI: 10.1378/chest.07-0617. View

3.
Lebreton G, Schmidt M, Ponnaiah M, Folliguet T, Para M, Guihaire J . Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation network organisation and clinical outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Greater Paris, France: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2021; 9(8):851-862. PMC: 8055207. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00096-5. View

4.
Elsayed H, Hassaballa A, Ahmed T, Gumaa M, Sharkawy H, Moharram A . Variation in outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation between different countries for patients with severe COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021; 16(6):e0252760. PMC: 8177443. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252760. View

5.
Combes A, Peek G, Hajage D, Hardy P, Abrams D, Schmidt M . ECMO for severe ARDS: systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46(11):2048-2057. PMC: 7537368. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06248-3. View