» Articles » PMID: 37529821

Patterns and Predictors of Abortion Care-Seeking Practices in India: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey (2019-2021)

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2023 Aug 2
PMID 37529821
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background India continues to have unsafe abortions despite progressive legislation since the past five decades facilitating ease of access to abortion services. This study describes abortion care-seeking patterns (social/therapeutic/humanitarian/sex-selective/safe/unsafe), preferences (public/private/at home), and their determinants among Indian women. Methods Data were taken from the Indian National Family and Health Survey (NFHS-5) (2019-2021) including women aged 15-49 years, who had terminated their last pregnancy by induced abortion within five years prior to the survey (N = 5,856). A bivariate analysis, followed by a multinomial logistic regression model, was performed to assess the predictors affecting the choice of healthcare facility type for an abortion. Predictors of unsafe and self-managed abortions were examined using binary logistic regression. Results About 665,671 women in the reproductive age group responded to the survey, of which 3.42% (n=22,767) reported their most recent pregnancy within the last five years terminated in either a miscarriage, stillbirth or abortion, of which 5,856 (25.72%) underwent an induced abortion. Women undergoing surgical abortion were more likely to avail of either a public (adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR)=38.06 (23.62, 61.35)) or a private facility (aRRR=44.53 (28.11,70.53)) compared to at-home abortions. Women reporting a social and humanitarian reason for abortion were less likely to undergo an abortion at a public (aRRR=0.25 (0.17,0.35)) or private facility (aRRR=0.32 (0.23,0.44)) than at home. Furthermore, a total of 147 (2.43%) abortions were classified as unsafe. Women reporting sex-selective reasons for abortion were observed to have a higher likelihood of engaging in an unsafe abortion (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)= 1.61 (0.70, 3.70)) compared to those citing a therapeutic reason. Conclusions Self-managed abortions at home were more prevalent in women of lower socioeconomic status, adolescent girls, and those reporting sex-selective reasons for abortion. Furthermore, the reproductive-health program in India should enhance capacity-building initiatives for primary-care healthcare providers, including doctors, nurses, and pharmacists, to effectively prescribe and supervise abortion through medication methods.

Citing Articles

Reflections on my international genetic counseling rotations: Contrasts in practice between India and the United States.

Jadeja N, Rajakumar N, Reddy N, Ali N, Lichten L Genet Med Open. 2024; 2(Suppl 2):101871.

PMID: 39712964 PMC: 11658547. DOI: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101871.


A global scoping review of the circumstances of care seeking for abortion later in pregnancy.

Jacobson L, Darney B, Johnston H, Ganatra B PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(12):e0003965.

PMID: 39636911 PMC: 11620362. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003965.

References
1.
Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tuncalp O, Moller A, Daniels J . Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014; 2(6):e323-33. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X. View

2.
Onukwugha F, Magadi M, Sarki A, Smith L . Trends in and predictors of pregnancy termination among 15-24 year-old women in Nigeria: a multi-level analysis of demographic and health surveys 2003-2018. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20(1):550. PMC: 7507716. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03164-8. View

3.
Munakampe M, Zulu J, Michelo C . Contraception and abortion knowledge, attitudes and practices among adolescents from low and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):909. PMC: 6267062. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3722-5. View

4.
Patil P, Sarang B, Bhandarkar P, Ghoshal R, Roy N, Gadgil A . Does women's empowerment and their socioeconomic condition affect the uptake of breast cancer screening? Findings from NFHS-5, India. BMC Womens Health. 2023; 23(1):7. PMC: 9824936. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-02147-5. View

5.
Basu S . Abortion services and ethico-legal considerations in India: The case for transitioning from provider-centered to women-centered care. Dev World Bioeth. 2020; 21(2):74-77. DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12296. View