» Articles » PMID: 37528305

Timeliness of Breast Diagnostic Imaging and Biopsy in Practice: 15 Years of Collecting, Comparing, and Defining Quality Breast Cancer Care

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Aug 1
PMID 37528305
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The literature lacks well-established benchmarks for expected time between screening mammogram to diagnostic imaging and then to core needle breast biopsy.

Methods: Timeliness of diagnostic imaging workup was evaluated using aggregate data from 2005 to 2019 submitted to The National Quality Measures for Breast Centers (NQMBC).

Results: A total of 419 breast centers submitted data for 1,805,515 patients on the time from screening mammogram to diagnostic imaging. The overall time was 7 days with 75th, 25th, and 10th percentile values of 5, 10, and 13.5 days, respectively. The average time in business days decreased from 9.1 to 7.1 days (p < 0.001) over the study period with the greatest gains in poorest-performing quartiles. Screening centers and centers in the Midwest had significantly shorter time to diagnostic imaging. Time from diagnostic imaging to core needle biopsy was submitted by 406 facilities representing 386,077 patients. The average time was 6 business days, with 75th, 25th, and 10th percentiles of 4, 9, and 13.7 days, respectively. Time to biopsy improved from a mean of 9.0 to 6.3 days (p < 0.001) with the most improvement in the poorest-performing quartiles. Screening centers, centers in the Midwest, and centers in metropolitan areas had significantly shorter time to biopsy.

Conclusions: In a robust dataset, the time from screening mammogram to diagnostic imaging and from diagnostic imaging to biopsy decreased from 2005 to 2019. On average, patients could expect to have diagnostic imaging and biopsies within 1 week of abnormal results. Monitoring and comparing performance with reported data may improve quality in breast care.

Citing Articles

Housing Status and Cancer Screening in US Veterans.

Decker H, Graham L, Titan A, Hawn M, Kushel M, Kanzaria H J Gen Intern Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40011415 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-09098-7.


ASO Author Reflections: Increasing Time of Diagnosis to Breast Cancer Surgery.

Kaufman C, Sarantou T, Donovan C, Polat A, Thomas P, Mack B Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(7):4541-4542.

PMID: 38683306 PMC: 11164769. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15295-9.

References
1.
Bleicher R, Ruth K, Sigurdson E, Beck J, Ross E, Wong Y . Time to Surgery and Breast Cancer Survival in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2015; 2(3):330-9. PMC: 4788555. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4508. View

2.
Hanna T, King W, Thibodeau S, Jalink M, Paulin G, Harvey-Jones E . Mortality due to cancer treatment delay: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020; 371:m4087. PMC: 7610021. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m4087. View

3.
Mayo 3rd R, Parikh J . Breast Imaging: The Face of Imaging 3.0. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016; 13(8):1003-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.03.010. View

4.
Weldon C, Friedewald S, Kulkarni S, Simon M, Carlos R, Strauss J . Radiology as the Point of Cancer Patient and Care Team Engagement: Applying the 4R Model at a Patient's Breast Cancer Care Initiation. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016; 13(12 Pt B):1579-1589. PMC: 5127438. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.008. View

5.
Landercasper J, Linebarger J, Ellis R, Mathiason M, Johnson J, Marcou K . A quality review of the timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in an integrated breast center. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210(4):449-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.015. View