» Articles » PMID: 37527381

Examining Predictors of Early Admission and Transfer to the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit

Overview
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2023 Aug 1
PMID 37527381
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Previous studies have demonstrated that rapid transfer to definitive care improves the outcomes for many time-sensitive conditions. The critical care resuscitation unit (CCRU) improves the operations of the University of Maryland Medical Center (UMMC) by expediting the transfers and resuscitations for critically ill patients who exceed the resources at other facilities. In this study we investigated CCRU transfer patterns to determine patient characteristics and logistical factors that influence bed assignments and transfer to the CCRU. We hypothesized that CCRU physicians prioritize transfer for critically ill patients. Therefore, those patients would be transferred faster.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all non-traumatic adult patients transferred to the CCRU from other hospitals between January 1-December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was the interval from transfer request to CCRU bed assignment. The secondary outcome was the interval from transfer request to CCRU arrival. We used multivariate logistic regressions to determine associations with the outcomes of interest.

Results: A total of 1,741 patients were admitted to the CCRU during the 2018 calendar year. Of those patients, 1,422 were transferred from other facilities and were included in the final analysis. Patients' mean age was 57 ± 17 years with a median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 3 [interquartile range 1-6]. Median time from transfer request to CCRU bed assignment was 8 (0-70) minutes. A total of 776 (55%) patients underwent surgical intervention after arrival. Using the median transfer request to bed assignment time, we found that patients requiring stroke neurology (odds ratio [OR] 5.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.85-10.86), having higher SOFA score (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.001-1.07), and needing an immediate operation (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.98-4.13) were associated with immediate bed assignment time (≤8 minutes). Patients who were operated on (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99) were significantly less likely to have an immediate bed assignment time.

Conclusion: The CCRU expedited the transfer of critically ill patients who needed urgent interventions from outside facilities. Higher SOFA scores and the need for urgent neurological or surgical intervention were associated with near-immediate CCRU bed assignment. Other institutions with similar models to the CCRU should perform studies to confirm our observations.

Citing Articles

Rurality and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Lavin C, Epstein J, Chen A, Cheema M, Yang J, Aquino A Crit Care Res Pract. 2025; 2025:4995600.

PMID: 39958465 PMC: 11824784. DOI: 10.1155/ccrp/4995600.


The Impact of the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit on Quaternary Care Accessibility for Rural Patients: A Comparative Analysis.

Tran Q, Ternovskaia A, Downing J, Cheema M, Kowansky T, Vashee I Crit Care Res Pract. 2024; 2024:9599855.

PMID: 39220227 PMC: 11362575. DOI: 10.1155/2024/9599855.

References
1.
Tran Q, OConnor J, Vesselinov R, Haase D, Duncan R, Aitken A . The Critical Care Resuscitation Unit Transfers More Patients From Emergency Departments Faster and Is Associated With Improved Outcomes. J Emerg Med. 2019; 58(2):280-289. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.09.041. View

2.
Strauch U, Bergmans D, Winkens B, Roekaerts P . Short-term outcomes and mortality after interhospital intensive care transportation: an observational prospective cohort study of 368 consecutive transports with a mobile intensive care unit. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(4):e006801. PMC: 4420937. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006801. View

3.
Worster A, Bledsoe R, Cleve P, Fernandes C, Upadhye S, Eva K . Reassessing the methods of medical record review studies in emergency medicine research. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 45(4):448-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.11.021. View

4.
Lowenstein S . Medical record reviews in emergency medicine: the blessing and the curse. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 45(4):452-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.01.032. View

5.
van Smeden M, de Groot J, Moons K, Collins G, Altman D, Eijkemans M . No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16(1):163. PMC: 5122171. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0267-3. View