Demographic and Motivational Differences Between Participants in Analog and Digital Citizen Science Projects for Monitoring Mosquitoes

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2023 Jul 31

PMID 37524770

Authors

Berj Dekramanjian

Frederic Bartumeus

Helge Kampen

John R B Palmer

Doreen Werner

Nadja Pernat

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Worldwide, citizen scientists help to map the distribution of native and introduced mosquito species in a variety of programs, contributing to environmental research and management decisions. Participant background, behavior, and engagement may vary depending on the project design, especially between those using digital apps and those using physical samples, which in turn may impact the quality and representativeness of the data collected. During the analysis of the responses to a survey directed at citizen scientists participating in a digital and an analog program, we found significant differences in the respondents' demographic backgrounds. Diverse participant motivations and varying sentiments towards mosquitoes were observed, indicating differing susceptibility in response to the program messages. The results can be translated into recommendations to further strengthen the appeal of citizen science projects and to promote and sustain public engagement in environmental research.

Citing Articles

Citizen Science and Multimedia Didactic Resources: Knowledge of Mosquito-Borne Diseases in an Urban Area of Southwestern Colombia.

Bedoya-Rodriguez F, Guevara-Fletcher C, Pelegrin J Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024; 9(11).

PMID: 39591262 PMC: 11598130. DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed9110256.

What's in it for citizen scientists? An Analysis of Participant Inclusivity in Citizen Science Projects in Advanced Physics Research.

Unterfrauner E, Fabian C, Hemming G, Garcia B Open Res Eur. 2024; 4():124.

PMID: 39524110 PMC: 11549546. DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.17436.2.

Mosquitoes on a chip-environmental DNA-based detection of invasive mosquito species using high-throughput real-time PCR.

Wittwer C, Sharif C, Schock I, Klimpel S PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17782.

PMID: 39364359 PMC: 11448751. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17782.

Assessing and correcting neighborhood socioeconomic spatial sampling biases in citizen science mosquito data collection.

Padilla-Pozo A, Bartumeus F, Montalvo T, Sanpera-Calbet I, Valsecchi A, Palmer J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22462.

PMID: 39341898 PMC: 11439082. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73416-6.

Emerging technologies in citizen science and potential for insect monitoring.

Sheard J, Adriaens T, Bowler D, Buermann A, Callaghan C, Camprasse E Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1904):20230106.

PMID: 38705194 PMC: 11070260. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0106.

References

Asingizwe D, Poortvliet P, van Vliet A, Koenraadt C, Ingabire C, Mutesa L . What do people benefit from a citizen science programme? Evidence from a Rwandan citizen science programme on malaria control. Malar J. 2020; 19(1):283. PMC: 7409712. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-020-03349-8. View

OMara-Eves A, Brunton G, Oliver S, Kavanagh J, Jamal F, Thomas J . The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15:129. PMC: 4374501. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1352-y. View

Bonney R, Shirk J, Phillips T, Wiggins A, Ballard H, Miller-Rushing A . Citizen science. Next steps for citizen science. Science. 2014; 343(6178):1436-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1251554. View

Kelling S, Fink D, La Sorte F, Johnston A, Bruns N, Hochachka W . Taking a 'Big Data' approach to data quality in a citizen science project. Ambio. 2015; 44 Suppl 4:601-11. PMC: 4623867. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-015-0710-4. View

Parrish J, Jones T, Burgess H, He Y, Fortson L, Cavalier D . Hoping for optimality or designing for inclusion: Persistence, learning, and the social network of citizen science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(6):1894-1901. PMC: 6369789. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1807186115. View

Nov O, Arazy O, Anderson D . Scientists@Home: what drives the quantity and quality of online citizen science participation?. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e90375. PMC: 3972171. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090375. View

Sullivan G, Artino Jr A . Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ. 2014; 5(4):541-2. PMC: 3886444. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18. View

Craig A, Kama Jr N, Fafale G, Bugoro H . Citizen science as a tool for arboviral vector surveillance in a resourced-constrained setting: results of a pilot study in Honiara, Solomon Islands, 2019. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):509. PMC: 7962342. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10493-6. View

Higgins E . Beyond pleasure and pain. Am Psychol. 1998; 52(12):1280-300. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.12.1280. View

10.

Palmer J, Oltra A, Collantes F, Delgado J, Lucientes J, Delacour S . Citizen science provides a reliable and scalable tool to track disease-carrying mosquitoes. Nat Commun. 2017; 8(1):916. PMC: 5655677. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00914-9. View

11.

Bartumeus F, Oltra A, Palmer J . Citizen Science: A Gateway for Innovation in Disease-Carrying Mosquito Management?. Trends Parasitol. 2018; 34(9):727-729. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2018.04.010. View

12.

Walther D, Kampen H . The Citizen Science Project 'Mueckenatlas' Helps Monitor the Distribution and Spread of Invasive Mosquito Species in Germany. J Med Entomol. 2017; 54(6):1790-1794. PMC: 5850493. DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjx166. View

13.

Maund P, Irvine K, Lawson B, Steadman J, Risely K, Cunningham A . What motivates the masses: Understanding why people contribute to conservation citizen science projects. Biol Conserv. 2020; 246:108587. PMC: 7263733. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108587. View

14.

Land-Zandstra A, Devilee J, Snik F, Buurmeijer F, van den Broek J . Citizen science on a smartphone: Participants' motivations and learning. Public Underst Sci. 2015; 25(1):45-60. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515602406. View

15.

Beza E, Steinke J, van Etten J, Reidsma P, Fadda C, Mittra S . What are the prospects for citizen science in agriculture? Evidence from three continents on motivation and mobile telephone use of resource-poor farmers. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0175700. PMC: 5418078. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175700. View

16.

Moczek N, Nuss M, Kohler J . Volunteering in the Citizen Science Project "Insects of Saxony"-The Larger the Island of Knowledge, the Longer the Bank of Questions. Insects. 2021; 12(3). PMC: 8003976. DOI: 10.3390/insects12030262. View

17.

Kullenberg C, Kasperowski D . What Is Citizen Science?--A Scientometric Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0147152. PMC: 4713078. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147152. View

18.

Pocock M, Tweddle J, Savage J, Robinson L, Roy H . The diversity and evolution of ecological and environmental citizen science. PLoS One. 2017; 12(4):e0172579. PMC: 5378328. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172579. View

19.

Pernat N, Zscheischler J, Kampen H, Ostermann-Miyashita E, Jeschke J, Werner D . How media presence triggers participation in citizen science-The case of the mosquito monitoring project 'Mückenatlas'. PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0262850. PMC: 8853470. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262850. View