» Articles » PMID: 37523916

Discriminating Cocaine Use from Other Sympathomimetics Using Wearable Electrocardiographic (ECG) Sensors

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2023 Jul 31
PMID 37523916
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Our group has established the feasibility of using on-body electrocardiographic (ECG) sensors to detect cocaine use in the human laboratory. The purpose of the current study was to test whether ECG sensors and features are capable of discriminating cocaine use from other non-cocaine sympathomimetics.

Methods: Eleven subjects with cocaine use disorder wore the Zephyr BioHarness™ 3 chest band under six experimental (drug and non-drug) conditions, including 1) laboratory, intravenous cocaine self-administration, 2) after a single oral dose of methylphenidate, 3) during aerobic exercise, 4) during tobacco use (N=7 who smoked tobacco), and 5) during routine activities of daily inpatient living (unit activity). Three ECG-derived feature sets served as primary outcome measures, including 1) the RR interval (i.e., heart rate), 2) a group of ECG interval proxies (i.e., PR, QS, QT and QTc intervals), and 3) the full ECG waveform. Discriminatory power between cocaine and non-cocaine conditions for each of the three outcomes measures was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve.

Results: All three outcomes successfully discriminated cocaine use from unit activity, exercise, tobacco, and methylphenidate conditions with a mean AUROC values ranging from 0.66 to 0.99 and with least squares means values all statistically different/higher than 0.5 among all subjects [F(3, 99) = 3.38, p =0.02] and among those with tobacco use [F(4, 84) = 5.39, p = 0.0007].

Conclusions: These preliminary results support discriminatory power of wearable ECG sensors for detecting cocaine use.

References
1.
Magnano A, Talathoti N, Hallur R, Jurus D, Dizon J, Holleran S . Effect of acute cocaine administration on the QTc interval of habitual users. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97(8):1244-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.046. View

2.
Boyer E, Fletcher R, Fay R, Smelson D, Ziedonis D, Picard R . Preliminary efforts directed toward the detection of craving of illicit substances: the iHeal project. J Med Toxicol. 2012; 8(1):5-9. PMC: 3550228. DOI: 10.1007/s13181-011-0200-4. View

3.
Mohr D, Burns M, Schueller S, Clarke G, Klinkman M . Behavioral intervention technologies: evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013; 35(4):332-8. PMC: 3719158. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.008. View

4.
Natarajan A, Gaiser E, Angarita G, Malison R, Ganesan D, Marlin B . Conditional Random Fields for Morphological Analysis of Wireless ECG Signals. ACM BCB. 2016; 2014:370-379. PMC: 4697765. DOI: 10.1145/2649387.2649414. View

5.
Gajecki M, Berman A, Sinadinovic K, Rosendahl I, Andersson C . Mobile phone brief intervention applications for risky alcohol use among university students: a randomized controlled study. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2014; 9:11. PMC: 4091647. DOI: 10.1186/1940-0640-9-11. View