» Articles » PMID: 37523013

A Perspective on Model-Informed IVIVC for Development of Subcutaneous Injectables

Overview
Journal Pharm Res
Specialties Pharmacology
Pharmacy
Date 2023 Jul 31
PMID 37523013
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Subcutaneously administered drugs are growing in popularity for both large and small molecule drugs. However, development of these systems - particularly generics - is slowed due to a lack of formal guidance regarding preclinical testing and in vitro - in vivo correlations (IVIVC). Many of these methods, while appropriate for oral drugs, may not be optimized for the complex injection site physiologies, and release rate and absorption mechanisms of subcutaneous drugs. Current limitations for formulation design and IVIVC can be supported by implementing mechanistic, computational methods. These methods can help to inform drug development by identifying key drug and formulation attributes, and their effects on drug release rates. This perspective, therefore, addresses current guidelines in place for oral IVIVC development, how they may differ for subcutaneously administered compounds, and how modeling and simulation can be implemented to inform design of these products. As such, integration of modeling and simulation with current IVIVC systems can help in driving the development of subcutaneous injectables.

Citing Articles

Leveraging Model Master Files for Long-Acting Injectables.

Gong Y, Hopefl R, Li T, Hooker A, Silva D, Alam K Pharm Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39875758 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-025-03824-4.

References
1.
Viola M, Sequeira J, Seica R, Veiga F, Serra J, Santos A . Subcutaneous delivery of monoclonal antibodies: How do we get there?. J Control Release. 2018; 286:301-314. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.08.001. View

2.
Owen A, Rannard S . Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and challenges for long acting injectable therapies: Insights for applications in HIV therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016; 103:144-156. PMC: 4935562. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.02.003. View

3.
Skalko-Basnet N . Biologics: the role of delivery systems in improved therapy. Biologics. 2014; 8:107-14. PMC: 3964020. DOI: 10.2147/BTT.S38387. View

4.
Turner M, Balu-Iyer S . Challenges and Opportunities for the Subcutaneous Delivery of Therapeutic Proteins. J Pharm Sci. 2018; 107(5):1247-1260. PMC: 5915922. DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.01.007. View

5.
Shen J, Burgess D . In vitro-in vivo correlation for complex non-oral drug products: Where do we stand?. J Control Release. 2015; 219:644-651. PMC: 4739855. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.052. View