» Articles » PMID: 37521055

Enteric Methane Emissions in Grazing Dairy Systems

Overview
Journal JDS Commun
Date 2023 Jul 31
PMID 37521055
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Approximately 80% of agricultural CH comes from livestock systems, with 90% of that derived from enteric CH production by ruminants. Grazing systems are used worldwide to feed dairy cattle. Although quantifying enteric CH emissions in grazing systems has unique challenges, emerging technologies have made gaseous data collection more feasible and less laborious. Nevertheless, robust data sets on enteric CH emissions under various grazing conditions, as well as effective and economic strategies to mitigate CH emissions in grazing dairy cows, are still in high demand because data collection, feeding management, and milk market regulations (e.g., organic certification, grassfed) impose more challenges to grazing than confinement dairy systems. This review will cover management strategies to mitigate enteric CH emissions and applicability to pastoral dairy systems. The effects of enteric CH in the broader context of whole-system assessments will be discussed, which are key to assess the overall environmental impact of grazing dairies.

Citing Articles

Enteric Methane Emission in Livestock Sector: Bibliometric Research from 1986 to 2024 with Text Mining and Topic Analysis Approach by Machine Learning Algorithms.

Evangelista C, Milanesi M, Pietrucci D, Chillemi G, Bernabucci U Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(21).

PMID: 39518881 PMC: 11545165. DOI: 10.3390/ani14213158.


Evolving Dairy Cattle Systems in Chile: Structural Shifts and Adaptation Strategies.

Toro-Mujica P, Vera-Infanzon R Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(15).

PMID: 39123771 PMC: 11311103. DOI: 10.3390/ani14152245.


Seasonal Effect of Grass Nutritional Value on Enteric Methane Emission in Islands Pasture Systems.

Nunes H, Maduro Dias C, Vouzela C, Borba A Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(17).

PMID: 37685031 PMC: 10486569. DOI: 10.3390/ani13172766.

References
1.
Bargo F, Muller L, Delahoy J, Cassidy T . Milk response to concentrate supplementation of high producing dairy cows grazing at two pasture allowances. J Dairy Sci. 2002; 85(7):1777-92. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74252-5. View

2.
Hristov A, Melgar A, Wasson D, Arndt C . Symposium review: Effective nutritional strategies to mitigate enteric methane in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2022; 105(10):8543-8557. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-21398. View

3.
Antaya N, Ghelichkhan M, Pereira A, Soder K, Brito A . Production, milk iodine, and nutrient utilization in Jersey cows supplemented with the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum (kelp meal) during the grazing season. J Dairy Sci. 2019; 102(9):8040-8058. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-16478. View

4.
Antaya N, Soder K, Kraft J, Whitehouse N, Guindon N, Erickson P . Incremental amounts of Ascophyllum nodosum meal do not improve animal performance but do increase milk iodine output in early lactation dairy cows fed high-forage diets. J Dairy Sci. 2014; 98(3):1991-2004. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8851. View

5.
Patra A, Saxena J . A new perspective on the use of plant secondary metabolites to inhibit methanogenesis in the rumen. Phytochemistry. 2010; 71(11-12):1198-222. DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.05.010. View