» Articles » PMID: 37520252

Comparison of Dental Anesthetic Efficacy Between the Periodontal Intraligamentary Anesthesia and Other Infiltration Anesthesia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2023 Jul 31
PMID 37520252
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Uncertainty exists regarding the pain scores and the success rate of intraligamentary anesthesia compared to other infiltration anesthesia. Based on the conditions of clinical anesthesia techniques, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of intraligamentary anesthesia with other infiltration anesthesia.

Methods: The search was carried out in PubMed Central, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (via OVID), Embase (via OVID), and Scopus from the inception to March 26, 2023.

Results: Seven eligible randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results indicated no significant difference in the success rate (RR = 0.96; 95% CI [0.81-1.14]; = 0.65; I= 73%) and visual analog scale (VAS) during dental procedures (MD = 3.81; 95% CI [-0.54-8.16]; = 0.09; I= 97%) between intraligamentary anesthesia and other infiltration anesthesia. However, intraligamentary anesthesia exhibited a higher VAS score during injection than other infiltration anesthesia (MD = 8.83; 95% CI [4.86-12.79];  < 0.0001; I= 90%). A subgroup analysis according to infiltration techniques showed that supraperiosteal anesthesia had a lower VAS score during dental procedures than intraligamentary anesthesia.

Conclusions: Intraligamentary anesthesia and other infiltration anesthesias have the same success rate and pain during dental procedures. However, the pain during injection of intraligamentary anesthesia is heavier than that of other infiltration anesthesia.

Citing Articles

Articaine Versus Mepivacaine in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Patients With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Alkandari M, Alshammari M, Ghaleb A, Alshammari T, Alenezi R, Almutairi S Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73360.

PMID: 39524167 PMC: 11550406. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73360.


The bevel effect: a prospective, randomized investigation into needle design in dental intraligamentary anesthesia.

Kammerer P, Staedt H, Wesslau K, Buttchereit I, Stiller H, Frankenberger T Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(3):170.

PMID: 38396049 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05546-0.


Assessing the Impact of Mandibular Molar Root Length on Success in Supplemental Intraligamentary Injection for Irreversible Pulpitis.

Kamali M, Parirokh M, Manochehrifar H, Nakhaei N Iran Endod J. 2024; 19(1):28-34.

PMID: 38223836 PMC: 10787187. DOI: 10.22037/iej.v19i1.42660.

References
1.
Wong D, Baker C . Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs. 1988; 14(1):9-17. View

2.
Haas D, Harper D, Saso M, Young E . Lack of differential effect by Ultracaine (articaine) and Citanest (prilocaine) in infiltration anaesthesia. J Can Dent Assoc. 1991; 57(3):217-23. View

3.
Jain M, Nazar N . Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Intraligamentary and Supraperiosteal Injections in the Extraction of Maxillary Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018; 19(9):1117-1121. View

4.
Younger J, McCue R, Mackey S . Pain outcomes: a brief review of instruments and techniques. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009; 13(1):39-43. PMC: 2891384. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-009-0009-x. View

5.
Ram D, Peretz B . The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe. J Dent Child (Chic). 2003; 70(2):130-3. View