» Articles » PMID: 37515669

Phase II Study of Border Zone Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Bevacizumab in Patients with Recurrent or Progressive Glioblastoma Multiforme

Overview
Journal J Neurooncol
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Jul 29
PMID 37515669
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Recurrent glioblastoma is universally fatal with limited effective treatment options. The aim of this phase 2 study of Border Zone SRS plus bevacizumab was to evaluate OS in patients with recurrent GBM.

Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed GBM with recurrent disease who had received prior first-line treatment with fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy and eligible for SRS were enrolled. Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg was given day -1, day 14, and then every 14 days until disease progression. 1-14 days before BZ-SRS procedure, patients underwent brain MRI /MRS. MRS with measurement of choline-to-N-acetyl aspartate index (CNI) area ≥ 3 was targeted for SRS.

Results: From 2015-2017, sixteen of planned 40 patients were enrolled. The median age was 62 (range, 48-74Y). 3/16 (0.188) participants experienced grade 2 toxicity. No AREs were reported. The mOS was 11.73 months compared to 8.74 months (P = 0.324) from date of SRS for the BZ-SRS and institutional historical controls, respectively. PFS-6 and OS-6 were 31.2% (p = 0.00294) and 81.2%(p = 0.058), respectively. Of 13 evaluable for best response: 1 CR (p = 0.077), 4 PR (p = 0.308), 7 SD (p = 0.538), and 1 PD (p = 0.077). 11/16 participants had MRS scans with an estimated probability that MRS changes a treatment plan of 0 (0, 0.285).

Conclusion: BZ-SRS with bevacizumab was feasible and well tolerated. There is no significant survival benefit using BZ-SRS with bevacizumab compared to institutional historical controls. Secondary analysis revealed a trend toward improved PFS-6, but not OS-6 after BZ-SRS. MRS scans did not result in changes to SRS treatment plans.

Citing Articles

Updates for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma: a review of recent clinical trials.

Fukushima C, de Groot J Curr Opin Neurol. 2024; 37(6):666-671.

PMID: 39258745 PMC: 11540275. DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001320.


Stereotactic radiosurgery versus combined stereotactic radiosurgery and bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma; a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival.

Habibi M, Ghorbani M, Esmaeilian S, Tajvidi F, Nekutalaban P, Boskabadi A Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):323.

PMID: 39002028 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02585-9.


Stimulation of tumoricidal immunity via bacteriotherapy inhibits glioblastoma relapse.

Zhang Y, Xi K, Fu Z, Zhang Y, Cheng B, Feng F Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):4241.

PMID: 38762500 PMC: 11102507. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48606-5.


Unexpected "Lazarus response" to single-agent bevacizumab in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Emshanov A, Nesterov D, Sokolova T, Amankwah P, Imyanitov E Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2024; 4(6):1157-1164.

PMID: 38213542 PMC: 10776590. DOI: 10.37349/etat.2023.00189.

References
1.
MAHALEY Jr M, Mettlin C, Natarajan N, Laws Jr E, Peace B . National survey of patterns of care for brain-tumor patients. J Neurosurg. 1989; 71(6):826-36. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1989.71.6.0826. View

2.
Combs S, Thilmann C, Edler L, Debus J, Schulz-Ertner D . Efficacy of fractionated stereotactic reirradiation in recurrent gliomas: long-term results in 172 patients treated in a single institution. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(34):8863-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.4157. View

3.
Tsien C, Pugh S, Dicker A, Raizer J, Matuszak M, Lallana E . NRG Oncology/RTOG1205: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Concurrent Bevacizumab and Reirradiation Versus Bevacizumab Alone as Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 41(6):1285-1295. PMC: 9940937. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.00164. View

4.
Wu A . Physics and dosimetry of the gamma knife. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1992; 3(1):35-50. View

5.
Niranjan A, Monaco Iii E, Kano H, Flickinger J, Lunsford L . Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Multimodality Management of Residual or Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme. Prog Neurol Surg. 2018; 31:48-61. DOI: 10.1159/000466998. View