» Articles » PMID: 37514795

Electromyographic Activity of the Pelvic Floor Muscles and Internal Oblique Muscles in Women During Running with Traditional and Minimalist Shoes: A Cross-Over Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Jul 29
PMID 37514795
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the effects of footwear on the electromyographic (EMG) activity of pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) and internal oblique (IO) muscles during running at different speeds. The study also aimed to explore the correlation between EMG activity of PFMs and IO muscles and participants' morphological characteristics. Ten nulliparous female runners were included in the study. The participants ran for 90 s at speeds of 9, 11, and 13 km/h wearing both traditional and minimalist shoes. EMG outcomes were presented as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC). Comparative analysis was conducted using the Wilcoxon rank test. Correlational analysis was performed using the Rho-Spearman correlation coefficient. The %MVC for the IO muscles was significantly lower when using minimalist shoes compared to traditional shoes ( = 0.04). No statistically significant differences were found for the PFMs ( > 0.05). The study also observed large correlations between age and %MVC of the PFMs and IO muscles (rho = -0.64; = 0.04). Minimalist shoes decreased the activity of IO muscles in female runners. However, no significant differences in EMG activity of PFMs were found when comparing traditional and minimalist footwear. The long-term effects of minimalist footwear on EMG activity of PFMs and IO muscles, as well as their relationship to morphological characteristics, require further investigation.

Citing Articles

Endurance and electromyographic assessment of abdominopelvic motor control in women with primary dysmenorrhea: a cross-sectional study.

Del Prado-Alvarez R, Estrada-Barranco C, Gonzalez-de-la-Flor A, de la Plaza San Frutos M, Almazan-Polo J, Guerineau F Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28836.

PMID: 39572611 PMC: 11582794. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79729-w.


Technologies for Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Functionality: A Systematic Review.

Forstl N, Adler I, Suss F, Dendorfer S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(12).

PMID: 38931784 PMC: 11207910. DOI: 10.3390/s24124001.

References
1.
Neumann P, Gill V . Pelvic floor and abdominal muscle interaction: EMG activity and intra-abdominal pressure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002; 13(2):125-32. DOI: 10.1007/s001920200027. View

2.
Goldstick O, Constantini N . Urinary incontinence in physically active women and female athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2013; 48(4):296-8. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091880. View

3.
Luginbuehl H, Naeff R, Zahnd A, Baeyens J, Kuhn A, Radlinger L . Pelvic floor muscle electromyography during different running speeds: an exploratory and reliability study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015; 293(1):117-124. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3816-9. View

4.
Campitelli N, Spencer S, Bernhard K, Heard K, Kidon A . Effect of Vibram FiveFingers Minimalist Shoes on the Abductor Hallucis Muscle. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2016; 106(5):344-351. DOI: 10.7547/14-084. View

5.
Leitner M, Moser H, Eichelberger P, Kuhn A, Radlinger L . Evaluation of pelvic floor muscle activity during running in continent and incontinent women: An exploratory study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016; 36(6):1570-1576. DOI: 10.1002/nau.23151. View