» Articles » PMID: 37511857

Fertility Preservation As an Option for Women with Genetic Disorders: Insights from a SWOT Analysis on Elective Oocyte Freezing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Overview
Journal Life (Basel)
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Jul 29
PMID 37511857
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper uses a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis to overview the option of fertility preservation in women with genetic diseases, who would later use preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders, in order to not transmit their condition. Strengths associated with elective oocyte freezing are ethical considerations, overall maternal and fetal safety, and effectiveness, if performed at <35 years of age. Weaknesses are related to costs and rare but present (<1-3%) risks of maternal complications. Counselling on fertility management aimed at preventing infertility offers a valuable opportunity, the same as it has been in oncological patients' care. The potentially high percentage of women with genetic conditions who would return to use their frozen oocytes also represents an opportunity together with the minimization of the need for egg donation, which has higher obstetrical risks compared to the use of autologous oocytes. Finally, a threat is represented by the potential psychological distress to young women who could never attempt to become pregnant through preimplantation genetic testing, or do it before any decline in their fertility. Potential unknown future long-term health risks for children conceived after egg vitrification/thawing are also a threat, but current knowledge is reassuring. Altogether, early counselling on the option of fertility preservation should thus be incorporated into standard care of all patients with any genetic condition.

Citing Articles

A retrospective study "myo-inositol is a cost-saving strategy for controlled ovarian stimulation in non-polycystic ovary syndrome art patients.".

Aragona C, Russo M, Myers S, Espinola M, Bilotta G, Unfer V Health Econ Rev. 2025; 15(1):20.

PMID: 40088331 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-025-00609-8.

References
1.
Van Der Kelen A, Santos-Ribeiro S, de Vos A, Verdyck P, De Rycke M, Berckmoes V . Parameters of poor prognosis in preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders. Hum Reprod. 2021; 36(9):2558-2566. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab136. View

2.
Hanson B, Scotchman E, Chitty L, Chandler N . Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD): how analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma has changed prenatal diagnosis for monogenic disorders. Clin Sci (Lond). 2022; 136(22):1615-1629. PMC: 9670272. DOI: 10.1042/CS20210380. View

3.
Alteri A, Pisaturo V, Nogueira D, DAngelo A . Elective egg freezing without medical indications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019; 98(5):647-652. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13573. View

4.
Milan M, Cobo A, Rodrigo L, Mateu E, Mercader A, Buendia P . Redefining advanced maternal age as an indication for preimplantation genetic screening. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010; 21(5):649-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.020. View

5.
Vanni V, Campo G, Cioffi R, Papaleo E, Salonia A, Vigano P . The neglected members of the family: non-BRCA mutations in the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway and reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2022; 28(2):296-311. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmab045. View