» Articles » PMID: 37510628

Exploring Bracing Adherence in Ponseti Treatment of Clubfoot: A Comparative Study of Factors and Outcomes in Uganda

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Jul 29
PMID 37510628
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Ponseti method of clubfoot treatment involves two phases: initial correction, usually including tenotomy; and bracing, to maintain correction and prevent relapse. Bracing should last up to four years, but in Uganda, approximately 21% of patients drop from clinical oversight within the first two years of using the brace. Our study compared 97 adherent and 66 non-adherent cases to assess the influential factors and effects on functional outcomes. We analyzed qualitative and quantitative data from clinical records, in-person caregiver interviews, and assessments of foot correction and functionality. Children who underwent tenotomy had 74% higher odds of adherence to bracing compared to those who did not undergo tenotomy. Conversely, children from rural households whose caregivers reported longer travel times to the clinic were more likely to be non-adherent to bracing (AOR 1.60 (95% CI: 1.11-2.30)) compared to those without these factors. Adhering to bracing for a minimum of two years was associated with improved outcomes, as non-adherent patients experienced 2.6 times the odds of deformity recurrence compared to adherent patients. Respondents reported transportation/cost issues, family disruptions, and lack of understanding about the treatment method or importance of bracing. These findings highlight the need to address barriers to adherence, including reducing travel/waiting time, providing ongoing education for caregivers on bracing protocol, and additional support targeting transportation barriers and household complexities.

Citing Articles

Clinical Characteristics and Whole Exome Sequencing Analysis in Serbian Cases of Clubfoot Deformity-Single Center Study.

Milanovic F, Ducic S, Jankovic M, Sindjic-Antunovic S, Dubljanin-Raspopovic E, Aleksic M Children (Basel). 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38929227 PMC: 11201961. DOI: 10.3390/children11060647.

References
1.
Kazibwe H, Struthers P . Barriers experienced by parents of children with clubfoot deformity attending specialised clinics in Uganda. Trop Doct. 2009; 39(1):15-8. DOI: 10.1258/td.2008.080178. View

2.
Evans A, Chowdhury M, Khan S . A Community Audit of 300 "Drop-Out" Instances in Children Undergoing Ponseti Clubfoot Care in Bangladesh-What Do the Parents Say?. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(3). PMC: 7908544. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18030993. View

3.
Anderson J, Dodman S, Kopelman M, Fleming A . Patient information recall in a rheumatology clinic. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1979; 18(1):18-22. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/18.1.18. View

4.
Hu W, Ke B, Niansu X, Li S, Li C, Lai X . Factors associated with the relapse in Ponseti treated congenital clubfoot. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):88. PMC: 8790874. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05039-9. View

5.
Smythe T, Wainwright A, Foster A, Lavy C . What is a good result after clubfoot treatment? A Delphi-based consensus on success by regional clubfoot trainers from across Africa. PLoS One. 2017; 12(12):e0190056. PMC: 5739468. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190056. View