Cost Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography in Cardiology: A Case Study of a University Hospital Complex in the Euro Region

Overview

Journal Healthcare (Basel)

Specialty Health Services

Date 2023 Jul 29

PMID 37510526

Authors

Francisco Reyes-Santias

Carlos Garcia-Garcia

Beatriz Aibar-Guzman

Ana Garcia-Campos

Octavio Cordova-Arevalo

Margarita Mendoza-Pintos

Sergio Cinza-Sanjurjo

Manuel Portela-Romero

Pilar Mazon-Ramos

Jose Ramon Gonzalez-Juanatey

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, several hospitals have incorporated MRI equipment managed directly by their cardiology departments. The aim of our work is to determine the total cost per test of both CT and MRI in the setting of a Cardiology Department of a tertiary hospital.

Materials And Methods: The process followed for estimating the costs of CT and MRI tests consists of three phases: (1) Identification of the phases of the testing process; (2) Identification of the resources consumed in carrying out the tests; (3) Quantification and assessment of inputs.

Results: MRI involves higher personnel (EUR 66.03 vs. EUR 49.17) and equipment (EUR 89.98 vs. EUR 33.73) costs, while CT consumes higher expenditures in consumables (EUR 93.28 vs. EUR 22.95) and overheads (EUR 1.64 vs. EUR 1.55). The total cost of performing each test is higher in MRI (EUR 180.60 vs. EUR 177.73).

Conclusions: We can conclude that the unit cost of each CT and MRI performed in that unit are EUR 177.73 and EUR 180.60, respectively, attributable to consumables in the case of CT and to amortization of equipment and staff time in the case of MRI.

Citing Articles

AI-Enabled CT Cardiac Chamber Volumetry Predicts Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Comparable to MRI.

Naghavi M, Reeves A, Atlas K, Zhang C, Li D, Atlas T JACC Adv. 2025; 3(11):101300.

PMID: 39741645 PMC: 11686054. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101300.

Breast Implants: Low Rate of Annual Check-Ups Results in Delayed Presentation of Ruptured Implants.

Flores T, Kerschbaumer C, Glisic C, Weber M, Schrogendorfer K, Bergmeister K J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518683 PMC: 11547161. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216545.

3D Ultrasonic Brain Imaging with Deep Learning Based on Fully Convolutional Networks.

Ren J, Wang X, Liu C, Sun H, Tong J, Lin M Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(19).

PMID: 37837171 PMC: 10575417. DOI: 10.3390/s23198341.

References

Valbuena-Lopez S, Hinojar R, Puntmann V . Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiology Practice: A Concise Guide to Image Acquisition and Clinical Interpretation. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016; 69(2):202-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2015.11.011. View

Maron D, Hochman J, Reynolds H, Bangalore S, OBrien S, Boden W . Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(15):1395-1407. PMC: 7263833. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922. View

Gomez-Ulla F, Alonso F, Aibar B, Gonzalez F . A comparative cost analysis of digital fundus imaging and direct fundus examination for assessment of diabetic retinopathy. Telemed J E Health. 2008; 14(9):912-8. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0013. View

Martin G, Riley R, Collins G, Sperrin M . Developing clinical prediction models when adhering to minimum sample size recommendations: The importance of quantifying bootstrap variability in tuning parameters and predictive performance. Stat Methods Med Res. 2021; 30(12):2545-2561. PMC: 8649413. DOI: 10.1177/09622802211046388. View

Ge Y, Pandya A, Steel K, Bingham S, Jerosch-Herold M, Chen Y . Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stable Chest Pain Syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020; 13(7):1505-1517. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.02.029. View

Paquette S, Lin J . Outpatient Telemedicine Program in Vascular Surgery Reduces Patient Travel Time, Cost, and Environmental Pollutant Emissions. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019; 59:167-172. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.01.021. View

Pandya A, Yu Y, Ge Y, Nagel E, Kwong R, Abu Bakar R . Evidence-based cardiovascular magnetic resonance cost-effectiveness calculator for the detection of significant coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022; 24(1):1. PMC: 8734365. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-021-00833-1. View

Pennell D, Sechtem U, Higgins C, Manning W, Pohost G, Rademakers F . Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25(21):1940-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.040. View

Kozor R, Walker S, Parkinson B, Younger J, Hamilton-Craig C, Selvanayagam J . Cost-Effectiveness of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Diagnosing Coronary Artery Disease in the Australian Health Care System. Heart Lung Circ. 2020; 30(3):380-387. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.07.008. View

10.

Centonze M, Lorenzin G, Francesconi A, Cademartiri F, Casagranda G, Fusaro M . Cardiac-CT and Cardiac-MR examinations cost analysis, based on data of four Italian Centers. Radiol Med. 2015; 121(1):12-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-015-0566-5. View

11.

Ripley D, Brown J, Everett C, Bijsterveld P, Walker S, Sculpher M . Rationale and design of the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary heart disease 2 trial (CE-MARC 2): a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of diagnostic strategies in suspected coronary heart disease. Am Heart J. 2014; 169(1):17-24.e1. PMC: 4277294. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.10.008. View

12.

Reyes-Santias F, Antelo M . Explaining the adoption and use of computed tomography and magnetic resonance image technologies in public hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):1278. PMC: 8626964. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07225-2. View

13.

Barreiro-Perez M, Tundidor-Sanz E, Martin-Garcia A, Diaz-Pelaez E, Iscar-Galan A, Merchan-Gomez S . First Magnetic Resonance Managed by a Cardiology Department in the Spanish Public Healthcare System. Experience and Difficulties of an Innovative Model. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018; 71(5):365-372. DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.03.010. View

14.

Richter A, Khoshgoftaar T . A review of statistical and machine learning methods for modeling cancer risk using structured clinical data. Artif Intell Med. 2018; 90:1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2018.06.002. View

15.

Stacul F, Pozzi-Mucelli F, Lubin E, Gava S, Cuttin-Zernich R, Grisi G . MR angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremities: activity-based cost analysis. Radiol Med. 2006; 111(1):73-84. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-006-0008-5. View

16.

Terpenning S, Stillman A . Cost-effectiveness for imaging stable ischemic disease. Br J Radiol. 2020; 93(1113):20190764. PMC: 7465859. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190764. View

17.

Propper C . Agency and incentives in the NHS internal market. Soc Sci Med. 1995; 40(12):1683-90. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00285-2. View

18.

Taylor A, Cerqueira M, Hodgson J, Mark D, Min J, OGara P . ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed.... J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56(22):1864-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.005. View