» Articles » PMID: 37505417

Tracheostomy Versus Prolonged Intubation in Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: a Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Can J Anaesth
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2023 Jul 28
PMID 37505417
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Tracheostomy is a surgical procedure that is commonly performed in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). It is frequently required in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), a subset of patients with prolonged altered state of consciousness that may require a long period of mechanical respiratory assistance. While many clinicians favour the use of early tracheostomy in TBI patients, the evidence in favour of this practice remains scarce. The aims of our study were to evaluate the potential clinical benefits of tracheostomy versus prolonged endotracheal intubation, as well as whether the timing of the procedure may influence outcome in patients with moderate to severe TBI.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicentre cohort study based on data from the provincial integrated trauma system of Quebec (Québec Trauma Registry). The study population was selected from adult trauma patients hospitalized between 2013 and 2019. We included patients 16 yr and older with moderate to severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score < 13) who required mechanical ventilation for 96 hr or longer. Our primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital and ICU mortality, six-month mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilator-associated pneumonia, ICU and hospital length of stay as well as orientation of patients upon discharge from the hospital. We used propensity score covariate adjustment. To overcome the effect of immortal time bias, an extended Cox shared frailty model was used to compare mortality between groups.

Results: From 2013 to 2019, 26,923 patients with TBI were registered in the Québec Trauma Registry. A total of 983 patients who required prolonged endotracheal intubation for 96 hr or more were included in the study, 374 of whom underwent a tracheostomy and 609 of whom remained intubated. We observed a reduction in 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.21 to 0.53) associated with tracheostomy compared with prolonged endotracheal intubation. This effect was also seen in the ICU as well as at six months. Tracheostomy, when compared with prolonged endotracheal intubation, was associated with an increase in the duration of mechanical respiratory assistance without any increase in the length of stay. No effect on mortality was observed when comparing early vs late tracheostomy procedures. An early procedure was associated with a reduction in the duration of mechanical respiratory support as well as hospital and ICU length of stay.

Conclusion: In this multicentre cohort study, tracheostomy was associated with decreased mortality when compared with prolonged endotracheal intubation in patients with moderate to severe TBI. This effect does not appear to be modified by the timing of the procedure. Nevertheless, the generalization and application of these results remains limited by potential residual time-dependent indication bias.

Citing Articles

Clinical management and nursing care for patients with tracheostomy following traumatic brain injury.

Mao X, Zhou Y, Chen Q, Zhang Y Front Neurol. 2025; 15:1455926.

PMID: 39758785 PMC: 11695352. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1455926.


Early tracheostomy for neurologic critical care patients improves neurologic function and reduces pulmonary infections.

Zhao J, Yao Y, Fang L, Zhou H, Zhou J Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(11):6727-6735.

PMID: 39678561 PMC: 11645605. DOI: 10.62347/WQJA8819.


Tracheostomy Timing in Unselected Critically Ill Patients with Prolonged Intubation: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Tekin P, Bulut A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 38792271 PMC: 11121849. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102729.


Characteristics of infection in intensive care unit before (2007-2010) and after (2011-2014) the beginning of an antimicrobial stewardship program.

Strazzulla A, Adrien V, Houngnandan S, Devatine S, Bahmed O, Abroug S Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024; 4(1):e60.

PMID: 38698949 PMC: 11062793. DOI: 10.1017/ash.2024.53.


A nomogram for predicting the necessity of tracheostomy after severe acute brain injury in patients within the neurosurgery intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study.

Gao L, Chang Y, Lu S, Liu X, Yao X, Zhang W Heliyon. 2024; 10(6):e27416.

PMID: 38509924 PMC: 10951500. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27416.

References
1.
Esteban A, Anzueto A, Alia I, Gordo F, Apezteguia C, Palizas F . How is mechanical ventilation employed in the intensive care unit? An international utilization review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 161(5):1450-8. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9902018. View

2.
Kang B, Cho J, Lee J, Jung K . Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Trauma Patients: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study of 5 Years' Data at a Single Institution in Korea. World J Surg. 2018; 42(6):1742-1747. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4474-4. View

3.
Tong C, Kleinberger A, Paolino J, Altman K . Tracheotomy timing and outcomes in the critically ill. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 147(1):44-51. DOI: 10.1177/0194599812440262. View

4.
Andriolo B, Andriolo R, Saconato H, Atallah A, Valente O . Early versus late tracheostomy for critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 1:CD007271. PMC: 6517297. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007271.pub3. View

5.
Siempos I, Ntaidou T, Filippidis F, Choi A . Effect of early versus late or no tracheostomy on mortality and pneumonia of critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2015; 3(2):150-158. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00007-7. View