» Articles » PMID: 37504225

Decision Making in the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Effect of Biomimetic Dentistry Training

Overview
Journal Dent J (Basel)
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Jul 28
PMID 37504225
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) is challenging as these teeth often present with structural deficiencies. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the final restoration choice. Historically, the full coverage crown was the universally selected treatment for endodontically treated teeth. With advances in adhesive and biomimetic dentistry, more minimally invasive treatment modalities have become a viable option. With this study, we aim to understand the restorative decision of the general dentist with or without additional training in biomimetic dentistry. Seventy-eight general dentists, with or without biomimetic training, were surveyed to determine their restorative preferences on five extracted posterior teeth, categorized according to volumetric loss of tooth structure, as indicated by the number of missing walls, the isthmus width, the presence or absence of marginal ridges, and cusps. CAD/CAM reconstructions were made with the teeth to analyze the volume of tooth loss and compare these with the survey results. Data were compared using the chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. The frequency of responses recommending a crown and the volume of tooth loss were correlated using the Pearson test ( < 0.05). For all five teeth, survey responses showed a statistically significant difference in the restorative decision of full coverage versus alternative restorations, with biomimetic dentists selecting a direct restoration or inlay/onlay in lieu of a full coverage crown ( = 63, < 0.05). The age of the participant did not have a significant impact on the restorative decision making process for these teeth. The biomimetic trained dentists showed a greater tendency to select a crown option only when the volume of tooth loss was greatest, otherwise their restorative decisions tended towards the conservative treatment options. This study also demonstrates a novel method of digitally developing a volume of tooth loss to compare against the visual interpretation of the volume of tooth loss.

Citing Articles

Management of Traumatized Teeth With Severely Calcified Canals and Minimally Invasive Access Cavity Using the AReneto® System: A Case Report.

Manaswini P, Prabhuji V, C C, A S, Pai V Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e70298.

PMID: 39463651 PMC: 11512723. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70298.


Clinical performance of polyethylenefiber reinforced resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth: (a randomized controlled clinical trial).

Metwaly A, Elzoghby A, Abd ElAziz R BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1285.

PMID: 39448991 PMC: 11515345. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05009-8.


A Finite Element Method Study of Stress Distribution in Dental Hard Tissues: Impact of Access Cavity Design and Restoration Material.

Botila M, Popa D, Mercut R, Iacov-Craitoiu M, Scrieciu M, Popescu S Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(9).

PMID: 39329620 PMC: 11429090. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11090878.


Direct Versus Indirect Treatment Options of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth: A Narrative Review.

Alhamdan M, Aljamaan R, Abuthnain M, Alsumikhi S, Alqahtani G, Alkharaiyef R Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67698.

PMID: 39318905 PMC: 11420522. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67698.


The Influence of Ferrule Design and Pulpal Extensions on the Accuracy of Fit and the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Endocrowns.

Saker S, Alqutaibi A, Alghauli M, Hashem D, Borzangy S, Farghal A Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(6).

PMID: 38541565 PMC: 10971874. DOI: 10.3390/ma17061411.

References
1.
Torabinejad M, Ung B, Kettering J . In vitro bacterial penetration of coronally unsealed endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 1990; 16(12):566-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80198-1. View

2.
KEREKES K, Tronstad L . Long-term results of endodontic treatment performed with a standardized technique. J Endod. 1979; 5(3):83-90. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(79)80154-5. View

3.
Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira P, Kanemura N, Morigami M, Tagami J . Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res. 1999; 78(4):906-11. DOI: 10.1177/00220345990780041101. View

4.
Bassir M, Labibzadeh A, Mollaverdi F . The effect of amount of lost tooth structure and restorative technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars. J Conserv Dent. 2013; 16(5):413-7. PMC: 3778622. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.117494. View

5.
Swanson K, Madison S . An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part I. Time periods. J Endod. 1987; 13(2):56-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80155-3. View