» Articles » PMID: 37503980

The Role of Negative Perfectionism and the Relationship Between Critical Thinking and the Halo Effect: Insights from Corporate Managers in Human Resources

Overview
Date 2023 Jul 28
PMID 37503980
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This research aims to explore the relationship between critical thinking and the halo effect among managers working in the Human Resources (HR) departments of corporations. By utilizing a sample of over 301 corporate HR managers as participants, this study provides valuable insight into the dynamics between critical thinking, the halo effect, and the mediating role of negative perfectionism. The findings of this study suggest a significant negative relationship between critical thinking and the halo effect, as well as a significant positive relationship between negative perfectionism and the halo effect. Notably, negative perfectionism acts as a mediator between critical thinking and the halo effect. Our research also reveals that compensation level moderates this relationship, with lower-income HR managers exhibiting a stronger association between negative perfectionism and the halo effect compared to higher-income HR managers. These findings significantly contribute to our understanding of the interplay between critical thinking and the halo effect among HR managers in corporate settings. Identifying negative perfectionism as a mediating factor clarifies the underlying mechanisms between critical thinking and the halo effect, while the moderating effect of compensation level highlights the importance of considering contextual factors. The practical implications of this research include the significance of promoting critical thinking skills among HR managers to mitigate the halo effect in job recruitment and performance evaluation. Additionally, organizations should prioritize fairness and consistency in compensation levels to minimize the influence of negative perfectionism and its impact on the halo effect.

References
1.
Zebrowitz L, Franklin Jr R . The attractiveness halo effect and the babyface stereotype in older and younger adults: similarities, own-age accentuation, and older adult positivity effects. Exp Aging Res. 2014; 40(3):375-93. PMC: 4020290. DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2014.897151. View

2.
Slade P, Owens R . A dual process model of perfectionism based on reinforcement theory. Behav Modif. 1998; 22(3):372-90. DOI: 10.1177/01454455980223010. View

3.
Shah A, Shafir E, Mullainathan S . Scarcity frames value. Psychol Sci. 2015; 26(4):402-12. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614563958. View

4.
Jing H, Madore K, Schacter D . Preparing for what might happen: An episodic specificity induction impacts the generation of alternative future events. Cognition. 2017; 169:118-128. PMC: 5612915. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.010. View

5.
Boag R, Strickland L, Loft S, Heathcote A . Strategic attention and decision control support prospective memory in a complex dual-task environment. Cognition. 2019; 191:103974. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.011. View