» Articles » PMID: 37503975

Task-Related Differences in End-Point Kinematics in School-Age Children with Typical Development

Overview
Date 2023 Jul 28
PMID 37503975
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding whether and how children with typical development adapt their reaches for different functional tasks could inform a more targeted design of rehabilitation interventions to improve upper extremity function in children with motor disabilities. This prospective study compares timing and coordination of a reach-to-drink, reach-to-eat, and a bilateral reaching task in typically developing school-aged children. Average speed, straightness, and smoothness of hand movements were measured in a convenience sample of 71 children, mean age 8.77 ± 0.48 years. Linear mixed models for repeated measures compared the variables by task, phases of the reach, task x phase interactions, and dominant versus non-dominant hands. There were significant main effects for task and phase, significant task x phase interactions ( < 0.05), and a significant difference between the dominant and non-dominant hand for straightness. Hand movements were fastest and smoothest for the reach-to-eat task, and least straight for the bilateral reaching task. Hand movements were also straighter in the object transport phases than the prehension and withdrawal phases. These results indicate that children with typical development change their timing and coordination of reach based on the task they are performing. These results can inform the design of rehabilitation interventions targeting arm and hand function.

Citing Articles

Object Weight and Hand Dominance Impact Kinematics in a Functional Reach-to-Drink Task in School-Aged Children.

Mazzarella J, Richie D, Chaudhari A, Pan X, Tudella E, Spees C Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(16).

PMID: 39205115 PMC: 11360325. DOI: 10.3390/s24165421.


Characterization of bilateral reaching development using augmented reality games.

Ziccardi S, Timanus S, Ashrafzadehkian G, Guy S, Hawe R Hum Mov Sci. 2024; 96:103254.

PMID: 39084100 PMC: 11404352. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2024.103254.


Handedness in Animals and Plants.

Guerra S, Castiello U, Bonato B, Dadda M Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(7):502.

PMID: 39015821 PMC: 7616222. DOI: 10.3390/biology13070502.

References
1.
Lee M, Ranganathan R, Newell K . Changes in object-oriented arm movements that precede the transition to goal-directed reaching in infancy. Dev Psychobiol. 2011; 53(7):685-93. DOI: 10.1002/dev.20541. View

2.
Allen M, Poggiali D, Whitaker K, Marshall T, van Langen J, Kievit R . Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization. Wellcome Open Res. 2023; 4:63. PMC: 6480976. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.2. View

3.
Gilliaux M, Dierckx F, Vanden Berghe L, Lejeune T, Sapin J, Dehez B . Age Effects on Upper Limb Kinematics Assessed by the REAplan Robot in Healthy School-Aged Children. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014; 43(5):1123-31. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-014-1189-z. View

4.
Steenbergen B, Marteniuk R, Kalbfleisch L . Achieving Coordination in Prehension: Joint Freezing and Postural Contributions. J Mot Behav. 1995; 27(4):333-348. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1995.9941722. View

5.
Rachwani J, Santamaria V, Saavedra S, Wood S, Porter F, Woollacott M . Segmental trunk control acquisition and reaching in typically developing infants. Exp Brain Res. 2013; 228(1):131-9. PMC: 3773211. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3544-y. View