Reduced Incidence of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Internal Brace Augmentation

Overview

Journal Orthop J Sports Med

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2023 Jul 28

PMID 37502199

Authors

Adam V Daniel

Coen A Wijdicks

Patrick A Smith

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Revision rates and outcome measures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with suture tape as an internal brace is not well-documented because of the emerging nature of the technique.

Hypothesis: ACLR with internal bracing (IB) would lead to decreased revision ACLR compared with traditional ACLR while exhibiting comparable patient outcomes.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: A total of 200 patients were included in this study. Patients aged between 13 and 39 years at the time of surgery who underwent primary autograft ACLR with IB between 2010 and 2020 and were enrolled in our institution's registry with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were identified and matched 1 to 1 with a non-internal brace (no-IB) group based on concomitant procedures and patient characteristics. Pre- and postoperatively, patients completed the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Marx activity rating scale, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey, and visual analog scale for pain. Knee laxity measurements via the KT-1000 arthrometer were included in the pre- and postoperative objective clinical assessments.

Results: A total of 100 IB patients were matched with 100 no-IB patients based primarily on concomitant procedures and secondarily on patient characteristics. The IB group underwent significantly fewer revision ACLRs (1% vs 8%; = .017). Even though the no-IB group had a significantly longer mean final follow-up time (48.6 months [95% CI, 45.4-51.7] vs 33.4 months [95% CI, 30.3-36.5]; < .001), the time elapsed from the original ACLR to the revision did not differ significantly between groups, and the mean ages for the IB and no-IB groups were comparable (19 vs 19.9 years). All postoperative patient-reported outcome scores between the 2 groups were comparable and significantly improved postoperatively except for the Marx score, which significantly decreased stepwise for both groups postoperatively. KT-1000 measurements significantly improved in both groups after surgery with the IB and no-IB cohorts yielding comparable results at the manual maximum pull (0.97 vs 0.65 mm).

Conclusion: ACLR with IB resulted in a significantly decreased risk of revision ACLRs while maintaining comparable patient-reported outcomes. Therefore, incorporating an internal brace into ACLR appears to be safe and effective within these study parameters.

Citing Articles

All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Full-Thickness All-Soft-Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft With Independent Suture Tape Augmentation.

Daniel A, Smith P Arthrosc Tech. 2025; 14(2):103190.

PMID: 40041322 PMC: 11873487. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103190.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Basics: Quadriceps Tendon (All-Soft Tissue) Autograft Preparation-Part 2.

Stokes D, Elrick B, Cram T, Schantz K, Shinsako K, Frank R Arthrosc Tech. 2025; 13(12):103147.

PMID: 39780892 PMC: 11704913. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103147.

Combining an internal tension relieving technique with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) reduces graft failure rate and improves functional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wen Y, Huang W, Li M, Jiang Y, Tong Y, Mei H J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):19.

PMID: 39773522 PMC: 11705829. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05451-6.

Outcomes of medial collateral ligament reconstruction with suture-augmented semitendinosus autograft.

Garside J, Bellaire C, Birhiray D, Kirloskar K, Argintar E Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 35(1):14.

PMID: 39567400 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04129-9.

References

Niki Y, Hakozaki A, Iwamoto W, Kanagawa H, Matsumoto H, Toyama Y . Factors affecting anterior knee pain following anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 20(8):1543-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1746-z. View

Kumar K, Maffulli N . The ligament augmentation device: an historical perspective. Arthroscopy. 1999; 15(4):422-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(99)70061-7. View

Duchman K, Lynch T, Spindler K . Graft Selection in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery: Who gets What and Why?. Clin Sports Med. 2016; 36(1):25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2016.08.013. View

Marx J, Plantz M, Gerlach E, Carney J, Swiatek P, Cantrell C . Revision ACL reconstruction has higher incidence of 30-day hospital readmission, reoperation, and surgical complications relative to primary procedures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 30(5):1605-1610. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06646-0. View

Bachmaier S, Smith P, Argintar E, Chahla J, Higgins L, Wijdicks C . Independent Suture Augmentation With All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Reduces Peak Loads on Soft-Tissue Graft. A Biomechanical Full-Construct Study. Arthroscopy. 2021; 38(1):88-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.09.032. View

Duthon V, Barea C, Abrassart S, Fasel J, Fritschy D, Menetrey J . Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 14(3):204-13. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-005-0679-9. View

Perez J, Emerson C, Barrera C, Greif D, Cade 2nd W, Kaplan L . Patient-Reported Knee Outcome Scores With Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Are Similar to Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament.... Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 7(12):2325967119890063. PMC: 6918041. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119890063. View

Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P, Olerud P, Wredmark T . There are differences in early morbidity after ACL reconstruction when comparing patellar tendon and semitendinosus tendon graft. A prospective randomized study of 107 patients. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2001; 11(3):170-7. View

Houck D, Kraeutler M, Vidal A, McCarty E, Bravman J, Wolcott M . Variance in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Selection based on Patient Demographics and Location within the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network Cohort. J Knee Surg. 2017; 31(5):472-478. PMC: 5780252. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604147. View

10.

Kamiya T, Otsubo H, Suzuki T, Shiwaku K, Kitamura C, Teramoto A . Hamstring Graft Prepared With Suture Tape Is Effective in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Analysis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021; 3(4):e1003-e1009. PMC: 8365212. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.02.008. View

11.

Salavati M, Akhbari B, Mohammadi F, Mazaheri M, Khorrami M . Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); reliability and validity in competitive athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19(4):406-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.01.010. View

12.

Bachmaier S, Smith P, Bley J, Wijdicks C . Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement of Small and Standard Diameter Grafts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Full Construct Model. Arthroscopy. 2017; 34(2):490-499. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.037. View

13.

Schmale G, Kweon C, Larson R, Bompadre V . High satisfaction yet decreased activity 4 years after transphyseal ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472(7):2168-74. PMC: 4048436. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3561-6. View

14.

Herzog M, Marshall S, Lund J, Pate V, Mack C, Spang J . Trends in Incidence of ACL Reconstruction and Concomitant Procedures Among Commercially Insured Individuals in the United States, 2002-2014. Sports Health. 2018; 10(6):523-531. PMC: 6204641. DOI: 10.1177/1941738118803616. View

15.

Parkes C, Leland D, Levy B, Stuart M, Camp C, Saris D . Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement. Arthroscopy. 2020; 37(2):609-616. PMC: 7867617. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.002. View

16.

Selim A, Rothendler J, Qian S, Bailey H, Kazis L . The History and Applications of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12). J Ambul Care Manage. 2022; 45(3):161-170. DOI: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000420. View

17.

Kitchen B, Mitchell B, Cognetti D, Siow M, Howard R, Carroll A . Outcomes After Hamstring ACL Reconstruction With Suture Tape Reinforcement in Adolescent Athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022; 10(4):23259671221085577. PMC: 9003649. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221085577. View

18.

Webster K, Feller J . Exploring the High Reinjury Rate in Younger Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44(11):2827-2832. DOI: 10.1177/0363546516651845. View

19.

Kim Y, Kubota M, Sato T, Inui T, Ohno R, Ishijima M . A bone bruise at the lateral and medial tibial plateau with an anterior cruciate ligament injury is associated with a meniscus tear. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 30(7):2298-2306. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06786-3. View

20.

Smith P, Bozynski C, Kuroki K, Henrich S, Wijdicks C, Cook J . Intra-Articular Biocompatibility of Multistranded, Long-Chain Polyethylene Suture Tape in a Canine ACL Model. J Knee Surg. 2018; 32(6):525-531. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1655765. View