» Articles » PMID: 37494689

Narrative Review of Use and Continued Relevance of the Maternal Infant Responsiveness Instrument

Overview
Date 2023 Jul 26
PMID 37494689
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Maternal Infant Responsiveness Instrument (MIRI) was developed in 2002 to measure a critical aspect of maternal-infant health. The objective of this analysis was to examine use, results, and continued relevance of the MIRI 20 years after its creation.

Methods: For the completion of this narrative review, 5 electronic databases were accessed using key search terms. Inclusion criteria were English-language, peer-reviewed research using the MIRI. Hand searches of reference lists were conducted. Five authors performed screening, data extraction, appraisal, and summarized findings.

Results: Fifteen studies were included. All studies reported an internal consistency of α > 0.70 for the MIRI. Positive correlations were reported with self-efficacy, infant temperament, and life satisfaction. Inverse relationships were reported with stress, depression, and experiential avoidance. Depressive symptomatology, life satisfaction, self-esteem, self-efficacy, and previous childcare experience were predictors of maternal responsiveness.

Discussion: Maternal well-being (postpartum depression and stress) can affect maternal responsiveness. Given the pervasive disparities in maternal health and well-being, it is important to have reliable measures of the effects of those disparities. The MIRI, a valid and reliable measure, may be useful for assessing the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve infant and maternal well-being.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Relationship Between Maternal Wellbeing, Infant Development, Smartphone Use, and Mother-Infant Responsiveness.

Golds L, Gillespie-Smith K, MacBeth A Infancy. 2025; 30(1):e70005.

PMID: 39917865 PMC: 11803550. DOI: 10.1111/infa.70005.


Mothers and Babies Virtual Group (MBVG) for perinatal Latina women: study protocol for a hybrid type-1 effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial.

Platt R, Polk S, Barrera A, Lara-Cinisomo S, Hirschhorn L, Graham A Trials. 2024; 25(1):606.

PMID: 39261967 PMC: 11391742. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08423-z.


Randomised controlled pilot feasibility trial of an early intervention programme for young infants with neurodevelopmental impairment in Uganda: a study protocol.

Nampijja M, Webb E, Nanyunja C, Sadoo S, Nalugya R, Nyonyintono J BMJ Open. 2019; 9(10):e032705.

PMID: 31601606 PMC: 6797334. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032705.

References
1.
Kim S, Park J, Lee Y, Seo H, Sheen S, Hahn S . Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66(4):408-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.016. View

2.
Medvedev M, Tumukunde V, Mambule I, Tann C, Waiswa P, Canter R . Operationalising kangaroo Mother care before stabilisation amongst low birth Weight Neonates in Africa (OMWaNA): protocol for a randomised controlled trial to examine mortality impact in Uganda. Trials. 2020; 21(1):126. PMC: 6995072. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-4044-6. View

3.
Graff J, Bush A, Palmer F, Murphy L, Whitaker T, Tylavsky F . Maternal and Child Characteristics Associated With Mother-Child Interaction in One-Year-Olds. Res Nurs Health. 2017; 40(4):323-340. DOI: 10.1002/nur.21798. View

4.
Moulds M, Black M, Newby J, Hirsch C . Correlates of repetitive negative thinking in postnatal first time mothers. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021; 41(1):53-64. DOI: 10.1080/02646838.2021.1946023. View

5.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View